Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jhardin@impsec.org designates
 207.210.83.140 as permitted sender)
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Hardin <jhardin@impsec.org>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
cc: Linda Walsh <sa-user@tlinx.org>, SA-users <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Discussion side point: levels of Trust
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20080611190223.02fc7818@resistor.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806121021160.10791@mercury.impsec.org>
References: <17763488.post@talk.nabble.com> <484EF43B.1060809@leisi.net>
 <484F79C8.8030106@leisi.net> <485071FE.5010001@tlinx.org>
 <6.2.5.6.2.20080611190223.02fc7818@resistor.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, SM wrote:

> At 17:46 11-06-2008, Linda Walsh wrote:
>>      How does one decided on 'trust'?  I.e. I think it would be
>> useful to assign a probability to "Trust" at the least.  I mean do I put
>> my ISP in my trusted server list?   -- suppose they start partnering with
>
> It could be a reputation system where you assign a probability.

Probability of what, exactly?

Bear in mind, "trusted" means "does not forge Received: headers", not 
"does not send or relay spam".

-- 
  John Hardin KA7OHZ                    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
  jhardin@impsec.org    FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
  key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
   People seem to have this obsession with objects and tools as being
   dangerous in and of themselves, as though a weapon will act of its
   own accord to cause harm. A weapon is just a force multiplier. It's
   *humans* that are (or are not) dangerous.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  6 days until SWMBO's Birthday