Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 44913 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2008 17:51:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2008 17:51:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 89627 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2008 17:51:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 89605 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2008 17:51:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 89594 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2008 17:51:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:51:23 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [128.119.55.19] (HELO marlin.bio.umass.edu) (128.119.55.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:50:33 +0000 Received: from peredhil.bio.umass.edu (peredhil.bio.umass.edu [128.119.54.86]) (authenticated bits=0) by marlin.bio.umass.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m5AHh5IE012938 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:43:16 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <484EBD2B.1090500@bio.umass.edu> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:43:07 -0400 From: Chris Hoogendyk User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Replies to this list References: <412A80AA28004AF28B251F772D69424A@mosquito> <20080607094834.GA22199@fantomas.sk> <20080607102023.GA23590@fantomas.sk> <20080608084025.GB6379@fantomas.sk> <7348FC9461B8173D748A33A9@sodor.cc.columbia.edu> <20080610154913.GI4095@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: <20080610154913.GI4095@freenet.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (marlin.bio.umass.edu [128.119.55.19]); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:43:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 128.119.55.19 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Michelle Konzack wrote: > Am 2008-06-09 09:45:05, schrieb Joseph Brennan: > >> I noticed I have to keep editing the To field every time I reply. >> Why doesn't the list insert a Reply-to directing replies to the list? >> > > We do not need it since recent/modern MUAs support . > > >> It does have a Mail-Followup-To field, a proposal from 1997 that was not >> included in RFC 2822 in 2001, so not surprisingly clients don't know >> they should use it. If it was "standardized" in the last couple of >> years I expect someone here to educate me :-) >> > > Sorry, but nearly all recent MUA support MTF. > Maybe you should upbrade yours? > hmm. Didn't notice "upbrade" rather than "upgrade" until I was actually replying. ;-) Anyway, so Thunderbird doesn't qualify on that count. Nor does Apple's Mail app. And Eudora is essentially gone now. So, I'm not sure what you mean by "nearly all recent MUA". I found an "experimental" add-on (a version 0.3.1) for Thunderbird that will do it, but unless it's in the MUA as a standard feature, you can't count on it as a standard behavior. I'll try the add-on, because it may be easier if it works, but I always do a reply-all and then remove everything but the list. I think that is what most people who actually think about it do. But, I get plenty of duplicates from lists that I participate in, because plenty of people don't think about it. --------------- Chris Hoogendyk - O__ ---- Systems Administrator c/ /'_ --- Biology & Geology Departments (*) \(*) -- 140 Morrill Science Center ~~~~~~~~~~ - University of Massachusetts, Amherst --------------- Erd�s 4