Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 15868 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2008 17:56:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jun 2008 17:56:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 36440 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2008 17:56:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 36428 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2008 17:56:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 36417 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2008 17:56:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:56:29 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bob@proulx.com designates 216.17.153.58 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.17.153.58] (HELO joseki.proulx.com) (216.17.153.58) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:55:30 +0000 Received: from dementia.proulx.com (dementia.proulx.com [192.168.1.115]) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD38FB40 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 11:55:51 -0600 (MDT) Received: by dementia.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 53F273CC698; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 11:55:51 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 11:55:51 -0600 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Replies to this list Message-ID: <20080609175551.GA7774@dementia.proulx.com> Mail-Followup-To: users@spamassassin.apache.org References: <412A80AA28004AF28B251F772D69424A@mosquito> <20080607094834.GA22199@fantomas.sk> <20080607102023.GA23590@fantomas.sk> <20080608084025.GB6379@fantomas.sk> <7348FC9461B8173D748A33A9@sodor.cc.columbia.edu> <2732.193.134.170.35.1213024767.squirrel@mail.leisi.net> <484D51DE.6080603@speed.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <484D51DE.6080603@speed.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: bob@proulx.com (Bob Proulx) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Kelson wrote: > Yeah, well, "Considered Harmful" essays are also considered harmful: > http://meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html It was inevitable that the format would be used on itself. > Let's remember that these essays are matters of individual opinion, not > statements of indisputable truth handed down from on high. They are still useful just the same. They are like FAQ documents. They inform and educate up to the present level of understanding of the issues involved in the problem. Since the Internet has no memory these are useful to hold the collective wisdom learned so far. Bob