spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Obantec Support" <supp...@obantec.net>
Subject Re: Undeliverable mails
Date Thu, 05 Jun 2008 08:10:07 GMT
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Hardin" <jhardin@impsec.org>
To: "Obantec Support" <support@obantec.net>
Cc: <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: Undeliverable mails


> On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Obantec Support wrote:
>
>> i looked over the above and my server seems to conform but it still 
>> scores low on an example email.
>>
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on 
>> my.mailserver.net
>> X-Spam-Level: ***
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.6 required=4.5 tests=ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE,AWL,
>> BAYES_99,BOUNCE_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.2.4
>
> VBOUNCE is not intended to mark bounces as spammy by itself, it's intended 
> to _identify_ them. In your delivery chain post-SA you'd look for 
> ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE in X-Spam-Status and then either deliver to a "bounces 
> for review" folder, or drop the message.
>
> You could, however, add a meta-rule that adds points for messages hitting 
> both ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE and BAYES_99, if you trust your bayes. I'd say 
> that's a pretty good indicator of a bounced spam.
>
> Perhaps:
>
>   meta   BOUNCED_SPAM  (ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE && BAYES_99)
>   score  BOUNCED_SPAM  4.0

how do i impliment the above?

Mark

> -- 
>  John Hardin KA7OHZ                    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
>  jhardin@impsec.org    FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
>  key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>   A sword is never a killer, it is but a tool in the killer's hands.
>                           -- Lucius Annaeus Seneca (Martial) 4BC-65AD
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  14 days until SWMBO's Birthday
>
> 


Mime
View raw message