Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54752 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2007 04:13:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Sep 2007 04:13:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 46020 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2007 04:12:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 45993 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2007 04:12:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 45984 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2007 04:12:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:12:50 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bob@proulx.com designates 216.17.153.58 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.17.153.58] (HELO joseki.proulx.com) (216.17.153.58) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 04:14:46 +0000 Received: from dementia.proulx.com (dementia.proulx.com [192.168.1.115]) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA00FA5E for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:12:28 -0600 (MDT) Received: by dementia.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 80F1610759F9; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:12:28 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:12:28 -0600 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: What is more annoying than being joe-jobbed? Message-ID: <20070919041228.GA14357@dementia.proulx.com> Mail-Followup-To: users@spamassassin.apache.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: bob@proulx.com (Bob Proulx) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org John D. Hardin wrote: > ...being joe-jobbed in a spam run that has Return-Receipt-To: headers. Fortunately you can probably reject those at the SMTP mta level and avoid most of the DDOS attack. > ARRRGGGHHHH! Don't forget Waaahhh! :-) Bob