Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 61496 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2006 17:31:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Sep 2006 17:31:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 63981 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2006 17:31:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 63956 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2006 17:31:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 63947 invoked by uid 99); 2 Sep 2006 17:31:47 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 10:31:47 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of billr@neocat.org designates 65.122.150.122 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.122.150.122] (HELO lookout-new.outlawnet.com) (65.122.150.122) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 10:31:45 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by lookout-new.outlawnet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56DD5D376 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 10:31:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lookout-new.outlawnet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lookout-new.outlawnet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with LMTP id 10785-07-2 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 10:31:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from neosoft.neocat.org (bc1159.bendcable.com [66.220.115.9]) by lookout-new.outlawnet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF045D36D for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 10:31:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from neosoft.neocat.org (neosoft.neocat.org [192.168.190.70]) by neosoft.neocat.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D362BBA9 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 10:31:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: OS X Server spam still getting through :-( From: Bill Randle To: Spamassassin In-Reply-To: <164701c6ceb1$21072f10$bf6911ac@watson1> References: <6111393.post@talk.nabble.com> <200609021348.19708@proffe.kibibyte.se> <6112023.post@talk.nabble.com> <164701c6ceb1$21072f10$bf6911ac@watson1> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Neo Software, Inc. Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 10:31:23 -0700 Message-Id: <1157218283.22091.62.camel@neosoft.neocat.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3-10.1.20060mdk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at outlawnet.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 09:59 -0700, Loren Wilton wrote: > > In the meantime ere is the mail I got based on your reply! > > > MTA-Interface: amavisd-new-2.3.3 (20050822) at mail.powerconsult.no > > X-Spam-Scanned: using SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) at > > mail.powerconsult.no > > It looks like you are using amvis-new to integrate SA in to the mail chain. > > There is a way to change the amvis config to get around this, but I'm not an > Amvis person and can't help you. You could probably find it with > considerable effort searching the archives, but someone else that knows > amvis will likely respond soon. Change $sa_tag_level_deflt to -99 in /etc/amavisd/amavisd.conf, or where ever the amavisd config file is located. This will report the SA info in the mail logs for any mail scored greater than -99. -Bill