Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 795 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2006 12:35:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jul 2006 12:35:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 84686 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2006 12:35:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 84664 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2006 12:35:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 84655 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jul 2006 12:35:40 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 05:35:40 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of scheidell@secnap.net designates 204.89.241.128 as permitted sender) Received: from [204.89.241.128] (HELO secnap2.secnap.com) (204.89.241.128) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 05:35:38 -0700 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 Subject: RE: Myway.com and RFC-ignorant.org Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 08:35:13 -0400 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Myway.com and RFC-ignorant.org Thread-Index: AcafSS3uKHFxZsQARf+N0mWtwjG/dgAG+IeA From: "Michael Scheidell" To: "Anthony Peacock" , "SpamAssassin Users" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > -----Original Message----- > From: Anthony Peacock [mailto:a.peacock@chime.ucl.ac.uk]=20 > Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 5:06 AM > To: SpamAssassin Users > Subject: Myway.com and RFC-ignorant.org > balance these scores out? I understand that SPF is not a sign of=20 > hammy/spammyness, but would I be openening up my system too much by=20 But maybe ignoring emails to postmaster@ and abuse@ and having no valid whois contacts IS a sign of spammyness, and that they don't care if their users spam, have viruses or pass along phishing emails. Since you use SPF, you could use whitelist from spf to make sure that you aren't allowing in forged myway.com spam. Put this in local.cf in ../etc/spamassassin directory where local config files are. Something like: whitelist_from_spf *@myway.com (which would allow SPAM from myway.com users, but not FORGED SPAM) or whitelist_from_spf remoteuser@myway.com (which would be the safest) However, $$$ is the best way to get myway.com to act. Tell your user to get another ISP. If myway.com doesn't care about spam, viruses, network abuse then they don't care about the internet. Vote with your feet. --=20 Michael Scheidell, CTO 561-999-5000, ext 1131 SECNAP Network Security Corporation Keep up to date with latest information on IT security: Real time security alerts: http://www.secnap.com/news =20