Mailing-List: contact dev-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.spamassassin.org
To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: [Bug 6724] DNS Blacklistsreturning purposefully wrong answers as
 part of Anti-Abuse / Free for Some Policies
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:06:09 +0000
Message-ID: <bug-6724-26-T0r89FjYlN@https.issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-6724-26@https.issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/>
References: <bug-6724-26@https.issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6724

--- Comment #22 from D. Stussy <software+spamassassin@kd6lvw.ampr.org> 2011-12-13 22:06:09 UTC ---
I have no problem with a different exponential or geometric based delay value
between 1.0 and 1.5.  However, consider that some list may base its timeout
from a ban list not on how long a query source has been listed (i.e. the first
query) but on how much time has passed since the last query attempt.  Such
would favor a greater rate of delay increase in finding the appropriate window
where queries are once again allowed.  5% is too low for that case.  Let's make
it adminstrator configurable with a default of 10% (or a multiplier
1.1/check-cycle).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.