Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 92033 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 16:35:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 16:35:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 18235 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 16:35:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-dev-archive@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 18173 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 16:35:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 18160 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 16:35:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:35:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.2.4.66] (HELO mail.ijs.si) (193.2.4.66) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:35:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1241A1D1CD8 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 18:35:24 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ijs.si; h= user-agent:in-reply-to:message-id:organization:from:from :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:date:references :subject:subject:content-type:content-type:received:received :received; s=jakla2; t=1246552517; x=1249144517; bh=yQYVgB/w0tjN si+DWK+K/9ApxVEmW1QI184aFxEv8Ig=; b=ZxeH0ETroQgctoaKj2QoJIpmw0Rp BqPk3w5ljT/hsigbkMrrM4VsQBpwnm+Xjh+42mLNwrV8vBAGa8b3ELBvS8ZK4d2H CnWVWAXjhdHHZGUEYiJnyXIWiWuqIYXCgDLayg7T1CQxjCt0MW8+bAP/U+NQGei2 xbAoP55PZzDba84= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si Received: from mail.ijs.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id nPN2psIOOzM7 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 18:35:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edina.ijs.si (unknown [IPv6:2001:1470:ff80:0:2e0:81ff:fe72:51d]) by mail.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650141D1C09 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 18:35:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from blackbird.ijs.si (p5099e2ec.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.153.226.236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by edina.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42AA722E5ED for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 18:35:16 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Subject: Re: dkim2.t failures References: <6c399e450907020409j7c14c578n422a6a8bc8a8522e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:35:12 +0200 To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Mark Martinec" Organization: J. Stefan Institute Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <6c399e450907020409j7c14c578n422a6a8bc8a8522e@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.00 (Win32) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:09:46 +0200, Justin Mason wrote: > 2009/7/2 Mark Martinec : >> On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:13:52 +0200, Kevin A. McGrail >> wrote: >> >>> I'm running long tests and net tests and getting a lot of failures in the >>> DKIM area. I'm running 0.28. >>> >>> Is this a known issue? Should I upgrade DKIM and try again which would >>> like make me suggest a higher version requirement for the makefile. >> >> Don't know, it passes all tests for me. >> Does it happen to others too? > > yep, me too. There are no DKIM-related rules in the testing .cf file. Something like the following should do, although I'm not sure what is the right place to put these: at the end of data/01_test_rules.cf place the: ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM full DKIM_SIGNED eval:check_dkim_signed() full DKIM_VALID eval:check_dkim_valid() full DKIM_VALID_AU eval:check_dkim_valid_author_sig() endif Mark