Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-34051-apmail-spamassassin-dev-archive=spamassassin.apache.org@spamassassin.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 27048 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2007 19:18:24 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Dec 2007 19:18:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 74049 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2007 19:18:07 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-dev-archive@spamassassin.apache.org
Received: (qmail 74028 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2007 19:18:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@spamassassin.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@spamassassin.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@spamassassin.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Received: (qmail 74006 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2007 19:18:07 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 11:18:07 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:18:17 +0000
Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
	id 01A8171424B; Fri,  7 Dec 2007 11:17:55 -0800 (PST)
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.spamassassin.org
To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: [Bug 5608] Say sa-compile is not for user_prefs
Message-ID: <5608.47599C63.EE794621.dev@spamassassin.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <5608.dev@spamassassin.apache.org>
References: <5608.dev@spamassassin.apache.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Date: Fri,  7 Dec 2007 11:17:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5608





------- Additional Comments From spamassassin@dostech.ca  2007-12-07 11:17 -------
> > you'll have people using "include" in their user_prefs file to include .cf files
> 
> I hope you say explicitly somewhere this is a no-no.

Why?  There's nothing wrong with using "include <file>" in a user_prefs file. 
Doing so won't get you the rules compiled and Matt's original wording wasn't
clear on that point.

The documentation can't spell out every possible outcome for every possible
configuration.  At some point people have to read the documentation and then use
their brain to figure out how it applies to their particular situation.





------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.