spamassassin-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Quinlan <quin...@pathname.com>
Subject Re: [Bug 3169] Fix SPF failures
Date Tue, 11 May 2004 04:59:51 GMT
> [re: net-daf] bizarre...  all spam?

Duncan had something weird going on with blank messages or something
like that.  Maybe he should disable nightly runs until it's fixed.

I suspect some of his failures are for the same reason as mine, see
below.

> [re: net-jm] fails are good, passes suck.

As expected.
 
> [re: net-quinlan] not terrific.

Most of my failures are historical.  SPF records unfortunately specify
"now", not "then".

> since SPF isn't a spam indicator, just a forgery indicator, as long as
> the hits are valid, I'm ok with the results?  can people double check
> so we can either fix things or close the ticket?

I'm not sure what we should do about failures.  This might be a case
where we have to avoid using the GA and go with human set scores,
initially very low until SPF is more generally reliable.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Quinlan                     anti-spam (SpamAssassin), Linux,
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/    and open source consulting

Mime
View raw message