spamassassin-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org
Subject [Bug 3238] Score below 10 is not zero-padded causes bad sorting
Date Mon, 05 Apr 2004 18:36:43 GMT
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3238

duncf@debian.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |duncf@debian.org
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |



------- Additional Comments From duncf@debian.org  2004-04-05 11:36 -------
> ok, we all seem to be -1, or at least all negative.  so closing this one as
> wontfix since it's now a conscious decision to display as 2.1 not 05.2.

Umm.. no, I was -0.7 on Quinlan's suggestion that we shouldn't 0-pad. I'm for
0-padding.

Sure, negative numbers and numbers over 100 are going to cause problems, but
these are quite rare in your spam folder. I sort my spam folder using the _HITS_
subject tag, and it works really well. I have yet to receieve a spam scoring
over 100, or a message marked as spam with a negative score (obviously).

Perhaps we should create another tag like _0SCORE_ or something. Regardless,
having the ability to have a zero padded score in the subject is pretty helpful.
(Space padding would be fine too -- 5.2f vs 05.2f ?)



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Mime
View raw message