spamassassin-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Chan <je...@surbl.org>
Subject Re: Announcing SpamCopURI 0.08 support of SURBL for spam URI domain tests
Date Sat, 03 Apr 2004 00:25:24 GMT
On Friday, April 2, 2004, 4:23:51 PM, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> jm@jmason.org (Justin Mason) writes:

>> Side issue: why use easy removal without questions? Spammers do not have
>> the bandwidth to remove themselves from every list.  If they *do* go to
>> the bother, and a URL does get removed, then repeatedly crops up in spam
>> again, it should be raised as an alarm -- and possibly brought to the
>> notice of other people -- e.g. this list or others.

> I'm not so sure easy removal is actually a good idea.  I think it's
> better to have FP-prevention mechanisms that don't require attention of
> the email sender.

Can you cite some examples of FP-prevention strategies?

Jeff C.
-- 
Jeff Chan
mailto:jeffc@surbl.org-nospam
http://www.surbl.org/


Mime
View raw message