sling-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Cris Rockwell (Jira)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SLING-9397) SAML2 Authentication Handler [initial submission]
Date Mon, 11 May 2020 13:55:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-9397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17104475#comment-17104475
] 

Cris Rockwell commented on SLING-9397:
--------------------------------------

Sounds great. Thanks [~rombert]!

> SAML2 Authentication Handler [initial submission]
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-9397
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-9397
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Authentication
>         Environment: localhost
>            Reporter: Cris Rockwell
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: SAML, authentification, security, user_management
>   Original Estimate: 168h
>          Time Spent: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 167h
>
> Here is a pull request which adds an authentication handler for a SAML2 Service Provider
via the embedded OpenSAML V3 dependencies
> [https://github.com/apache/sling-whiteboard/pull/51]
>  
> *TODO Before Initial*
> [X] Sync attributes released by the IDP
> [X] Confirm license and attribution 
> "As the code is ASL2 and does not require a notice or anything else, we don't need to
mention in. But I think its usually good style to do so and have a single sentence in our
NOTICE that we include (modified) code from ... which has ASL2 as the license"
>  
> *TODO After Initial* 
> [ ] Get confirmation the project builds and operates as expected
> [ ] Ensure that the NOTICE file is the correct one 
> [ ] Clarify whether we can depend on artifacts not deployed on Maven Central
> [ ] Review Web Browser SSO Profile Specification 4.1 and confirm all aspects 
> * [https://docs.oasis-open.org/security/saml/v2.0/saml-profiles-2.0-os.pdf]
> [ ] Consider whether use of {{SAML2ConfigService}} and {{SAML2ConfigServiceImpl}} is
a good design or not.
> [ ] Get feedback whether README instructions are too much, too little, unclear, etc
> [ ] Decide whether to make signing and encryption optional. Currently it is required
> [ ] Find and fix any bugs
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Mime
View raw message