Mailing-List: contact dev-help@sling.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@sling.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1505934415.26374.23.camel@apache.org>
References: <1505922524.26374.13.camel@apache.org> <CAOAO1SiOzAJo6wANs-kqkQE+BgbE3eq-hof6-3==vG0F60=eng@mail.gmail.com>
 <1505934415.26374.23.camel@apache.org>
From: Karl Pauls <karlpauls@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 21:36:39 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJnwQNhnLrqDXsCzBkaF9YLKxAY+zH2TdddRWyYMZ69POM4wJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [git] Which git system do we want to use?
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
archived-at: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 19:37:06 -0000

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Robert Munteanu <rombert@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 16:06 +0000, Justin Edelson wrote:
>> Hi,
>> While it is true that this project does not have an existing Github-
>> centric
>> workflow, I suspect that most of us use such a workflow on other
>> projects,
>> so I would be more in favor of the dual-master system.
>
> Right, we can benefit from a Github-centric model, even if we don't
> have the whole setup ready by the time we complete the migration.

Personally, I think if we move to git we should move to github as much
as possible. Otherwise, what is the point.

regards,

Karl

> Thanks,
>
> Robert
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Justin
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:48 AM Robert Munteanu <rombert@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > According to http://git.apache.org/ , there are two systems in use
>> > at
>> > the ASF:
>> >
>> > - the "Git Wip" system
>> > - the "Github Dual Master"
>> >
>> > I have not found any more information about these - Ian referenced
>> > the
>> > dual master some time ago [1], but AFAICT the "Wip" system is
>> > basically
>> > ASF hosted git mirrored to Github, while the "Dual Master" system
>> > allows us to push to Github as well as to the ASF Git.
>> >
>> > IMO the dual master system is for projects with a Github-centric
>> > workflow coming to the ASF, which is not our situation at all, so
>> > I'd
>> > go with the "Wip" system.
>> >
>> > What do others think?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Robert
>> >
>> >
>> > [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b8b0003cf9fcb1c365a9ed354
>> > fe7c
>> > 20c2c4c5b465c952829e0eb4c78@1458668880@%3Cdev.sling.apache.org%3E
>> >
>


-- 
Karl Pauls
karlpauls@gmail.com