sling-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Edelson <jus...@justinedelson.com>
Subject Re: [git] Which git system do we want to use?
Date Wed, 20 Sep 2017 18:35:54 GMT
Hi Tommaso,
Was it a pain to switch from wip to gitbox?

Regards,
Justin

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:17 PM Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>
wrote:

> in Apache OpenNLP we were on wip and then switched to gitbox afterwards
> because we found that easier when merging pull requests (less forks/origins
> to maintain) and wanted to enforce a stricter review process for commits so
> that now every contribution goes through a PR which needs +1s, on the other
> hand in Apache Lucene / Solr we have git-wip because we use it not much
> differently from how we used SVN in terms of development workflows.
> So I would say it depends on what we look for.
> For now I would opt for git-wip, but I see Justin's point and if more
> people want to go that way I can see the benefits.
>
> My 2 cents,
> Tommaso
>
> Il giorno mer 20 set 2017 alle ore 18:06 Justin Edelson <
> justin@justinedelson.com> ha scritto:
>
> > Hi,
> > While it is true that this project does not have an existing
> Github-centric
> > workflow, I suspect that most of us use such a workflow on other
> projects,
> > so I would be more in favor of the dual-master system.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Justin
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:48 AM Robert Munteanu <rombert@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > According to http://git.apache.org/ , there are two systems in use at
> > > the ASF:
> > >
> > > - the "Git Wip" system
> > > - the "Github Dual Master"
> > >
> > > I have not found any more information about these - Ian referenced the
> > > dual master some time ago [1], but AFAICT the "Wip" system is basically
> > > ASF hosted git mirrored to Github, while the "Dual Master" system
> > > allows us to push to Github as well as to the ASF Git.
> > >
> > > IMO the dual master system is for projects with a Github-centric
> > > workflow coming to the ASF, which is not our situation at all, so I'd
> > > go with the "Wip" system.
> > >
> > > What do others think?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Robert
> > >
> > >
> > > [1]:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b8b0003cf9fcb1c365a9ed354fe7c
> > > 20c2c4c5b465c952829e0eb4c78@1458668880@%3Cdev.sling.apache.org%3E
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message