Mailing-List: contact dev-help@sling.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@sling.apache.org
From: Antonio Sanso <asanso@adobe.com.INVALID>
To: "dev@sling.apache.org" <dev@sling.apache.org>
Subject: Re: OsgiServiceUtil and R6 annotations
Thread-Topic: OsgiServiceUtil and R6 annotations
Thread-Index: AQHS6l22FB660S4170Cz8Iq9xTdiNKIweR+A
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 07:12:31 +0000
Message-ID: <0ACE91E5-081E-4654-8288-078F0A2CE528@adobe.com>
References: <0AF4872F-BDC6-4FF0-895B-4622FBA9B5E4@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: <0AF4872F-BDC6-4FF0-895B-4622FBA9B5E4@adobe.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <D2E65873BC26934E8C35BD41D8087DD2@namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Jun 2017 07:12:31.8210
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: fa7b1b5a-7b34-4387-94ae-d2c178decee1
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR0201MB1585
archived-at: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 07:12:49 -0000

anyone :S ?

On Jun 21, 2017, at 9:12 AM, Antonio Sanso <asanso@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote=
:

> hi,
>=20
> I was investigating the test failure related to [0] and I thing I found a=
n issue/limitation with OsgiServiceUtil.
> Indeed the activateDeactivate method doesn=92t need to be able cope with =
the new R6 annotations.
> Fairly enough for case like ActivateDeactivate (aka [0]) being the Config=
 interface an inner one I would not know how OsgiServiceUtil can be able to=
 manage this scenario=85
>=20
> any idea?
>=20
> regards
>=20
> antonio
>=20
>=20
> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6957