sling-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tommaso Teofili <tomm...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [RT] Configurationless Sling?
Date Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:44:24 GMT
Il giorno mar 28 mar 2017 alle ore 15:13 Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacretaz@apache.org> ha scritto:

> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <cziegeler@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Julian Sedding wrote
> >>... As a convention for service users, would it make sense to use the
> >> bundle-symbolic-name as the user-ID (or principal-name)?...
>
> > ...We could use the bundle
> > symbolic name and the sub service information. That should be enough. We
> > don't need the class name....
>
> +1 and we might prefix this with bundle_ or b_ to make it clear where
> these usernames come from?
>
> I suppose in the vast majority of cases there's one service user per
> bundle, so that would remove a lot of boring configurations.
>

+1

Tommaso


>
> -Bertrand
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message