sling-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bertrand Delacretaz <>
Subject Re: [RT] Configurationless Sling?
Date Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:13:41 GMT
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <> wrote:
> Julian Sedding wrote
>>... As a convention for service users, would it make sense to use the
>> bundle-symbolic-name as the user-ID (or principal-name)?...

> ...We could use the bundle
> symbolic name and the sub service information. That should be enough. We
> don't need the class name....

+1 and we might prefix this with bundle_ or b_ to make it clear where
these usernames come from?

I suppose in the vast majority of cases there's one service user per
bundle, so that would remove a lot of boring configurations.


View raw message