Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-shiro-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-shiro-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67F0518859 for ; Sun, 8 Nov 2015 07:04:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78790 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2015 07:04:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-shiro-dev-archive@shiro.apache.org Received: (qmail 78744 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2015 07:04:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@shiro.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@shiro.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@shiro.apache.org Received: (qmail 78733 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2015 07:04:34 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 07:04:34 +0000 Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com (mail-ig0-f179.google.com [209.85.213.179]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id EFE6C1A022F for ; Sun, 8 Nov 2015 07:04:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbhv6 with SMTP id hv6so59154204igb.0 for ; Sat, 07 Nov 2015 23:04:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.82.73 with SMTP id g9mr15294953igy.67.1446966273255; Sat, 07 Nov 2015 23:04:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.107.136.23 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Nov 2015 23:04:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 02:04:33 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Are there still active devs on the project? From: Dan Dumont To: dev@shiro.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd911d4b843e205240216d6 --047d7bd911d4b843e205240216d6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 It looked like it got auto-assigned because it had an assignment as soon as I made it. Sounds good, ty. Was just checking to see if there was anyone to see it. I see some older issues that have patches assigned to them as well. On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > The issue is only six hours old and Jared's already assigned it to himself > (but sure, it's good to make noise preemptively if you want stuff done :P > ). I'll cut a release at some point. > > Kalle > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Dan Dumont wrote: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHIRO-549 > > > > That would be great! > > > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Kalle Korhonen < > kalle.o.korhonen@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > I'm probably it for maintaining 1.x. Which issue? There's another issue > > > I've promised to put in for 1.2.x, could take care of yours at the same > > > time. > > > > > > Kalle > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Dan Dumont wrote: > > > > > > > I took a look at the jira report for resolved jiras in the last 4 > weeks > > > and > > > > it was empty. > > > > > > > > Was hoping to get a very small patch I posted reviewed and applied > > > > (possibly pushed as a maint release (1.2.5)) > > > > > > > > > > --047d7bd911d4b843e205240216d6--