Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-shiro-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 89956 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2010 22:34:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Nov 2010 22:34:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 6233 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 22:34:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-shiro-dev-archive@shiro.apache.org Received: (qmail 6211 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 22:34:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@shiro.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@shiro.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@shiro.apache.org Received: (qmail 6203 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2010 22:34:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:34:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.161.45] (HELO mail-fx0-f45.google.com) (209.85.161.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:33:58 +0000 Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so3927469fxm.32 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:33:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.72.204 with SMTP id n12mr6077503faj.138.1291070018579; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:33:38 -0800 (PST) Sender: les.hazlewood@anjinllc.com Received: by 10.223.78.208 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:33:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5B2703FF-3A8E-48B3-AFFD-337F7FEDB14B@toolazydogs.com> <61D33861-E7B9-4E26-AFE4-F3F3F4ED0F37@toolazydogs.com> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:33:38 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: I_0twAeWDFd_10WtarvnGtO3MD8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Struts2 stuff From: Les Hazlewood To: dev@shiro.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Wicketstuff exists, so that's one definitive example at least. And I'm not stating that this is indeed the best solution - just merely stating that it seems to work well enough for the Wicket project and it *might* be something we want to look in to. Cheers, Les