shiro-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Les Hazlewood <>
Subject Re: Following through on suggestions from 1.0.0 release
Date Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:58:56 GMT
So, what are the next steps towards graduation?

Is all that is left is to hold a vote?


On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Kalle Korhonen
<> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Les Hazlewood <> wrote:
>> I started by copying-and-pasting bits of the source code shown on the
>> website, so our mentors recommended that we get his permission last
>> year just in case, which is why that statement is included in the
>> existing notice file.  As long as the URL for his website remains (his
>> 'attribution clause' requested of us), we can remove anything else.
> Yes, assumed so. Rephrased the wording as suggested and committed a new version.
>>> The Spring source notice is equally straight-forwarded. Spring is
>> That line was in there originally because I thought there was an
>> attribution requirement by Spring, but I double-checked and that only
>> applies to us redistributing their *documentation*.  We're definitely
>> not doing that, so we can move that part entirely.
> Right, I kept the Spring notice there but rephrased. Both serve more
> as courtesy notices as well as for copyrights, which is the primary
> purpose of the NOTICE file AFAIK.
> Kalle

View raw message