Mailing-List: contact shiro-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: shiro-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kalle.o.korhonen@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.223.183 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=kDX27B3LhNOkHKN+/PPpJb6JrXZ/6N/f7ZOdmLsF2xlcvJ1Y/LIKyg8o+aw/aAPiVb
         eOOS1BgIXnPyLWHP0iAIOFqj87W9bwUq9q/JZ/UbSiymB1V4ngDVWy9al+99pFZ0tCdD
         sqjpK0QL9dgz374kAj79nmKUaEy6fch4J4Qnk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <44b57a611002012039j64ca2afbq7717bccdc79fe503@mail.gmail.com>
References: <44b57a610912070744y7f04180bg6a3c7d499594af09@mail.gmail.com>
	 <DD39601D-710C-4E26-B6C8-1B33F67165A6@toolazydogs.com>
	 <44b57a610912160726x41b0a367r2aee1323fa96bda9@mail.gmail.com>
	 <44b57a610912160733q2577c53ch980f8ae516404389@mail.gmail.com>
	 <550B6D1C-31FA-49DC-A4D0-D0407AD386CF@toolazydogs.com>
	 <44b57a610912181306r37ff17e2ke8c6f05cc61ce5a7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <C9BCE4D7-23F3-47D4-AB22-044F540DBD49@toolazydogs.com>
	 <44b57a610912181319l5c9beafcl469497085aac5c70@mail.gmail.com>
	 <7281ca711002011954u491c1fe7je5e536fb323045dd@mail.gmail.com>
	 <44b57a611002012039j64ca2afbq7717bccdc79fe503@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 21:41:44 -0800
Message-ID: <7281ca711002012141i37912eb5tf4bb4546854fcd9b@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Preparing for our first release
From: Kalle Korhonen <kalle.o.korhonen@gmail.com>
To: shiro-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ha! I knew that would get the ball rolling :) I'll take care of
SHIRO-59. Agree with everything Les said - API changes would be
important to get in at this stage. I expect working through the
release preparation will still take a couple of weeks and we probably
have a good chance of closing out all of the remaining ones currently
scheduled in that timeframe - but there's no point holding up the
release if not.

Kalle


On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Les Hazlewood <lhazlewood@apache.org> wrote=
:
> I definitely agree - there are a few critical issues that I'd like to
> see if we can resolve:
>
> - =A0The RememberMeManager acquires the HttpServletRequest/Response pair
> from the ThreadLocal - I was thinking that might require an API change
> to the RememberMeManager to accept it as a method argument or in the
> Subject context map.
> - 'Run As' is about 50% done. =A0It shouldn't take much longer to finish
> - As Brian suggested, his patches would be a nice edition for the 1.0 rel=
ease.
>
> I agree that most of the other issues won't be done for the 1.0
> release, but that's ok - that's what 1.1 will be for or 1.2 or
> whatever. =A0It's definitely a good idea to get 1.0 out now to service
> the community's needs.
>
> We're definitely close!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Les
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Kalle Korhonen
> <kalle.o.korhonen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think it's a high time to do our first release. There's quite a few
>> smallish organizational and/or configuration items we need to do
>> before a release, most of them nicely tracked at
>> http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html. Color-wise, we are not doing
>> that bad but we could do better. Don't care about the all green much
>> but the page is tracking the right items, so I just picked up the
>> hammer and I'll start swinging. I'll be updating the progress here and
>> in case I run into issues. I'll first create the distribution area and
>> publish our site docs there. If there are any open issues any of you
>> would like to get closed before 1.0.0 better start working on them
>> now.. I don't think we are going to wait for all of the issues
>> currently scheduled for 1.0
>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=3Dtrue&=
mode=3Dhide&sorter/order=3DDESC&sorter/field=3Dpriority&resolution=3D-1&pid=
=3D12310950&fixfor=3D12314078)
>> to be completed unless they are critical/blocker. We'll just schedule
>> them for a later point release if not done until we are otherwise
>> ready for 1.0.0. Agree?
>>
>> Kalle
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Les Hazlewood <lhazlewood@apache.org> w=
rote:
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com>=
 wrote:
>>>> Done.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alan
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 18, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In light of this, could you please resolve the following issue?
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHIRO-41
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Les
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.c=
om>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For artwork it can get complicated but only if you received stipulat=
ions
>>>>>> on
>>>>>> its usage; it doesn't seem that there is any. =A0I think we're good =
here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Dec 16, 2009, at 7:33 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is one minor thing I forgot to mention: =A0Jeremy's friend cr=
eated
>>>>>>> the old JSecurity shield/lock logo for us. =A0He did the logo for u=
s in
>>>>>>> return for free website hosting on one of our servers. =A0This is
>>>>>>> payment for services rendered (he payed us by doing the logo work, =
the
>>>>>>> services rendered were the website hosting), so I don't think that =
we
>>>>>>> need a CLA/sign-off from him.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As I understand it, the shield/lock logo is our intellectual proper=
ty
>>>>>>> due to this agreement and we don't need to involve him. =A0IANAL, b=
ut I
>>>>>>> think we're ok.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Les
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Les Hazlewood <lhazlewood@apache.=
org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yep, it did. =A0Just for clarity's sake: every contributor on the =
old
>>>>>>>> JSecurity project came over as a committer to Apache and each also
>>>>>>>> sent the re-licensing agreement/affirmation at that time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Les
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Alan D. Cabrera
>>>>>>>> <list@toolazydogs.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, back in July Craig sent out a set of emails from committers i=
n the
>>>>>>>>> project stating that re-licensing for ASF. =A0What I am not sure =
of is
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> this covers *all* the original authors from the JSecurity project
>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>> arrived at the Incubator.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Dec 8, 2009, at 6:42 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Craig, can you please just confirm this so we have a clear recor=
d of
>>>>>>>>>> it?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Les
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera
>>>>>>>>>> <list@toolazydogs.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If Craig has confirmed that all the original authors from JSecu=
rity
>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>> filed a license agreement then I think we're good.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep, we're covered. =A0All people who contributed previously t=
o
>>>>>>>>>>>> JSecurity became committers to Shiro. =A0Before joining the
>>>>>>>>>>>> incubator,
>>>>>>>>>>>> we all formally (each) agreed to the transfer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Les
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
>>>>>>>>>>>> <list@toolazydogs.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I recall that agreements were forwarded by current project
>>>>>>>>>>>>> members.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> =A0I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> certain that we covered all the people who contributed to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> original
>>>>>>>>>>>>> project.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To the best of my knowledge this is all finished - Craig hel=
ped
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with it. =A0I forwarded all the formal statements from all p=
revious
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committers that they fully agree and support of transferring=
 all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their work to the ASF 2.0 license.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Craig, could you please clarify if there's anything else tha=
t
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> needs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Les
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <list@toolazydogs.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:44 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think most people in the Shiro community would agree tha=
t
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> long
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> overdue for our first release ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, to that end, and unless anyone objects, I'm going to t=
ake a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at tagging only what I feel are the most important issues =
that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> absolutely must be in to 1.0. =A0When I'm done with that, =
I'd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post to this list again to allow people the opportunity to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speak-up
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they see something that they think should be included but =
I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> missed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm doing this to help us get a little focus on what shoul=
d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concretely
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> define our first release, and to get it out as soon as pos=
sible
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now. =A0Just my opinion, but I think it'd be great if we c=
an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> finish
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 1.0 issues (if not actually release) by 1 January.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if anyone does not agree with this,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get started as soon as possible organizing the existing is=
sues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds great!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The only thing that's hazy in my mind is the LGPL vetting. =
=A0I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recall
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort to obtain permission to relicense the code from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> original
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authors
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but am not sure if it was completed and all the requisite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> permissions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> properly filed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>