Mailing-List: contact dev-help@shindig.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@shindig.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of henry.saputra@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.160.180 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAB56zCXhkE0-bB_Fj=KfL8_38Fyn6N2e6pUYHexfSr=cTPHRwA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAHduaq2+-VYfCUFHgDL9SpGb_7CAQvC6wyW7GmMvD1Ae5tmwbg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAB56zCUhX9jfBde8j5qcc2yMWa3G7r9vo39hyh9PO0ZBqz9Uyg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAB56zCXhkE0-bB_Fj=KfL8_38Fyn6N2e6pUYHexfSr=cTPHRwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:05:57 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CALuGr6ZMrZbL9SmyJ8x-wvOq3qPA7kE63S17HkBNGYe2KuVkdw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: No love for Java 5?
From: Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com>
To: dev@shindig.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hmm I always though we only build Java6 artifacts on purpose and let
consumers of Java5 profile build their own jars

- Henry

On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxter85@apache.org> wrote:
> It also just occurred to me that we should be building Java 5 artifacts for
> our releases which we have not been doing :(
>
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxter85@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We had a vote about this a year ago [1] and it looks like at least one
>> consumer said they needed Java 5 support.
>>
>> Mike, does Liferay still have the same requirements?
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Stanton Sievers <ssievers@apache.org>wrote:
>>
>>> Is anyone building or using Shindig in a Java 5 environment?  I've tried
>>> building against Java 5 with the "java5" profile and I've hit a half dozen
>>> compile issues already that have been around for a while.
>>>
>>> Are we planning on supporting Java 5 for 2.5.0?  I'd like to get the
>>> consensus on the dev list and then send a vote out to the users lists if
>>> necessary to get a feel for the desire to have Java 5 support.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Stanton
>>>
>>
>>