Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-shindig-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-shindig-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6AD7BD5F0 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 19:15:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49719 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2012 19:15:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-shindig-dev-archive@shindig.apache.org Received: (qmail 49698 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2012 19:15:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@shindig.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@shindig.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@shindig.apache.org Received: (qmail 49689 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2012 19:15:51 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 19:15:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-yx0-f180.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username rbaxter85, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 19:15:50 +0000 Received: by yenq6 with SMTP id q6so14048024yen.39 for ; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:15:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.181.137 with SMTP id dw9mr9504297igc.45.1341861349341; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:15:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.118.77 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:15:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ryan Baxter Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 15:15:29 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: iGoogle To: dev@shindig.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae934037910bba204c46a7117 --14dae934037910bba204c46a7117 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Doug, Paul had responded to a similar thread on the OpenSocial spec list [1]. [1] https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/opensocial-and-gadgets-s= pec/abooeRuiMcE On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:01 AM, daviesd wrote: > Anyone have any opinion what the shutdown of iGoogle means for Google=B9s > support of OpenSocial? I=B9m assuming (but don=B9t know for sure) that > Google+, > etc. use opensocial (or at least google gadgets)? Doesn=B9t this just me= an > that Google+ might become the new home for installing gadgets? I know th= e > Googlers probably can=B9t comment on this. Just wondering if this has an= y > bearing on opensocial. > > doug > --14dae934037910bba204c46a7117--