Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-shindig-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 30062 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2008 18:58:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 2008 18:58:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 47512 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2008 18:58:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-shindig-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 47497 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2008 18:58:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact shindig-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: shindig-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list shindig-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 47486 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2008 18:58:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 10:58:34 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [63.246.22.40] (HELO mail.atlassian.com) (63.246.22.40) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:57:04 +0000 Received: from tmoore-macpro.sf.atlassian.com (216-75-233-106.static.wiline.com [216.75.233.106]) by mail.atlassian.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F971631E87 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:57:51 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: From: Tim Moore To: shindig-dev@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: <9fec51e20812032109y69ce8db2qb63b6d401f7c46ae@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: Proposal To Branch for 1.0 Today Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 10:57:50 -0800 References: <30C6B6A2-1D3D-48AA-A7E4-3D8C99CD54EC@tfd.co.uk> <9fec51e20812032109y69ce8db2qb63b6d401f7c46ae@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Dec 3, 2008, at 9:09 PM, Dan Peterson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Evan Gilbert > wrote: > >> Responses below. Again, I don't feel too strongly ("slavish" may be a >> slightly strong characterization of my points), but I'm not seeing >> big >> benefits in the short term to major releases independent of spec >> revisions. >> >> The cost of maintaining a release can easily outweigh the benefits of >> releasing a new architecture earlier, when there is likely a spec rev >> coming >> up in a few months. I wouldn't tie down the versions but I do see >> benefits >> in starting with Opensocial Spec Version == Shindig version. >> >> Still happy to support the will of the group on this one - just >> wanted to >> make sure that these points were heard. >> > > As stated earlier in this thread, my stance is similar to Evan's -- > I worry > that we're going to confuse people by *starting off* with a Shindig > version > that is inflated ahead of the version of the OpenSocial spec. I > agree that > we'd probably not want to hold the Shindig version to be similar to > the > OpenSocial spec version in perpetuity. I was one of the people originally suggesting to keep the versions tied to the spec. I appreciate the arguments against that suggestion, and I'd ultimately be happy either way. But I think the *worst* option would be to start out tied to the spec version and then drift away from it. That would be hopelessly confusing. Thanks, -- Tim Moore Atlassian Plugin Developer