Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-shindig-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 71106 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2008 22:47:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Dec 2008 22:47:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 54201 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2008 22:47:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-shindig-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 54183 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2008 22:47:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact shindig-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: shindig-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list shindig-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 54172 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2008 22:47:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:47:37 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=10.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ianboston@googlemail.com designates 209.85.142.187 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.142.187] (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:47:23 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w7so475667tib.6 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:47:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=sL8A/0ZFC0FTansx8Pri+gLrtD453a9cDhdqUBenOfA=; b=yCxpVpFKYa6bsgCqaysF2X0zBzlnPh4jy+kFlIHgc7aquFP5uT5hxXRgB8c4Hp0Mu3 +t5+3bAC66mQr4uDEmOg+5BGlof2H1qulXj0PvPm9fRm9c3Grf8cCcgR987FNmi5U/+E DdI47END4GvcYNJWnGlXienBmpQyi/azwg6pU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=oXk5GsjTyH97gG2DbR/OkyBdIzQaATETk0JAVtRJ1+hafdh9AfMzPEZVIf+s9xsAQB Vngo1fmSy3omzaY1vio993bOM3xvI/5GJkB4/AuwYdBQY92W1SBQTVoTgquHJc86A86b 8ENrgWoR2E/v5C+tJ0YPj7Yc7RHNYY2cgIlSg= Received: by 10.110.53.19 with SMTP id b19mr2689648tia.38.1228949220866; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:47:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.4? (218-215-25-148.people.net.au [218.215.25.148]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u12sm5091204tia.9.2008.12.10.14.46.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:46:59 -0800 (PST) Sender: Ian Boston Message-Id: <59397853-E631-4261-A8E7-ABB1BBDD2D8B@tfd.co.uk> From: Ian Boston To: shindig-dev@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: Proposal To Branch for 1.0 Today Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:54:55 +0000 References: <30C6B6A2-1D3D-48AA-A7E4-3D8C99CD54EC@tfd.co.uk> <9fec51e20812032109y69ce8db2qb63b6d401f7c46ae@mail.gmail.com> <818767740812040007u7c31fd27l469d53660165780@mail.gmail.com> <76EAF719-D769-4EF4-BDE8-61DB693A5042@tfd.co.uk> <7D1F7E6D-A75F-4F71-B076-2AFEECA531E9@tfd.co.uk> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I believe the message ID was 76EAF719-D769-4EF4-BDE8-61DB693A5042@tfd.co.uk The message was " Ok, So I will redo the branch from trunk as 1.0.x-incubating with a version of 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT Trunk will become 1.1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT redoing the branch should also pull in the php re-factor and make future patches much easier. Since I am now on GMT, I will wait a few hours for others to wake up :) Ian " Which doesn't explicitly say from rebranch from head, but it does say redo, and talks about pulling in the php refactor. I may have been too cryptic. Ian On 8 Dec 2008, at 17:38, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: > Ian Boston writes: > > >> BTW, I didn't just 'delete the designated release branch and create >> one at a random point', we all spent several days talking about it on >> list, and you must have read the message that said what was going to >> happen.... its what started this micro thread. > > We did not discuss to move the branch point from where it was made for > 0.8.1-x to where it is now. If we did, then I missed the thread, > please give me a message-id for it. > > Ciao > Henning > > -- > Henning P. Schmiedehausen - Palo Alto, California, U.S.A. > henning@schmiedehausen.org "We're Germans and we use Unix. > henning@apache.org That's a combination of two demographic > groups > known to have no sense of humour > whatsoever." > -- Hanno Mueller, > de.comp.os.unix.programming