shindig-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Chabot <chab...@google.com>
Subject Re: Shindig Error Codes
Date Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:45:00 GMT
i've changed the php-shindig response error to 409 per Louis's feedback, so
we're consistent now

On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Louis Ryan <lryan@google.com> wrote:

> There was a somewhat drawn out discussion about this on the spec list and
> 409 was eventually agreed on despite its limitations. Until the spec
> changes
> thats what it should be.
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Ram Sharma <ramsharma2k5@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Any updates on this ?
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Chris Chabot <chabotc@google.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > 509 is an 'bandwidth exceeded' error, which sounds a bit like what it
> > > represents, but not quite :)
> > >
> > > I'm ok with any of the options, but 409 sounds like a decent option to
> > me.
> > >
> > > Anyone have any input on what they think it should be? And lets then
> make
> > > the error codes the same between implementations :)
> > >
> > >  -- Chris
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Astha Bhatnagar <
> > > asthabhatnagar2008@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Shindig Dev,
> > > >
> > > > I have a question regarding to Shindig Error coodes.
> > > >
> > > > According to http://markmail.org/message/ahwnla6mnfkmswxr the Error
> > code
> > > > for
> > > > Limit Exceeded should be 409 as it can be used for both conflict and
> > > limit
> > > > exceeded. But In JsonRPC container js file it is 417 written for
> > checking
> > > > the Limit exceeding error. In Restful container js file there is a
> > place
> > > > holder for the same. In PHP Shindig its 509 for the same.
> > > >
> > > > Accroding to opensocial-and-gadgets-spec discussion it should be 409.
> > But
> > > > by
> > > > the definition 509 it seems to be more correct. However, 509 is not
> an
> > > > official status code(see
> > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes).
> > > > My question is what should be the correct code 509 or 409 or or
> > > > 507(suggested in PHP comment) 417:P ? And shouldn't that code be
> > > > homegenously used across all the implementations?
> > > >
> > > > any suggestions or comments ?
> > > >
> > > > should I post this on opensocial-and-gadgets-spec list too as a
> > proposal
> > > ?
> > > >
> > > > Astha
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ram Sharma
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message