Mailing-List: contact issues-help@shale.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@shale.apache.org
Message-ID: <31682010.1155957082086.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Craig McClanahan (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@shale.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (SHALE-242) Review dependency version numbers
In-Reply-To: <25659634.1154366361232.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    [ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-242?page=comments#action_37976 ] 
            
Craig McClanahan commented on SHALE-242:
----------------------------------------

> There are no poms in ibiblio for Spring 1.2.8. Are we missing
> any of its transitive dependencies because of that?

AFAICT, we're not missing anything critical ... but we have only minimal coverage (in the tests for shale-usecases) for the Spring integration stuff.  I would think any problems with missing dependencies would affect any Spring user who explicitly declares a dependency on 1.2.8, not just Shale users relying on it transitively.

Do you think we should switch back to a Spring version that does have POMs?


> Review dependency version numbers
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SHALE-242
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-242
>             Project: Shale
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Clay, Core, Remoting, Test, Tiger, Tiles
>            Reporter: Craig McClanahan
>         Assigned To: Craig McClanahan
>             Fix For: 1.0.3-SNAPSHOT
>
>
> Review version numbers of dependencies listed in our POMs to make sure we've got the desired versions (normally latest release).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira