Mailing-List: contact dev-help@shale.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@shale.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4846ADFE.60005@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 11:00:14 -0400
From: Paul Spencer <paulsp@apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@shale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Shale 1.0.5
References: <91478db0806021648o569be5b0ua0ca4c8956156fe2@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <91478db0806021648o569be5b0ua0ca4c8956156fe2@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Greg,
I may be getting ahead of the processes, but below is what I have tested 
with My applications.

+1 for shale-dialog-basic
+1 for shale-dialog-scxml

-1 The copyright date in the notice file is 2007 instead of 2008
Aside from the copyright date, noted above, I only verified that 
notice.txt, manifest.mf and license.txt existed

The artifact where built using JDK 1.5.0_13.  Should they be built using 
1.4?

I used the staged artifacts for testing.  In addition I have request the 
Myfaces folks run this version of shale when testing Tomahawk.

Paul Spencer


Greg Reddin wrote:
> A set of artifacts for Shale 1.0.5 is now ready. Please review the
> artifacts mentioned below and vote accordingly. Since this is my first
> time as release manager I wouldn't be surprised if something is
> missing or if I've included things that shouldn't be included, so I'd
> appreciate as thorough a review as you have time for. In particular I
> see a lot of Maven artifacts and zip files that were not included in
> previous releases so I wonder if they are meant to be release (the
> *test* artifacts for example).
> 
> (1) The repository has been tagged here:
> 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shale/framework/tags/SHALE_1_0_5/
> 
> (2) The Maven artifacts are staged here:
> 
>  http://people.apache.org/builds/shale/shale-1.0.5/m2-staging-repository/
> 
>  org.apache.shale.extras:mailreader-jpa:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-application:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-apps-parent:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-blank:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-clay-usecases:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-clay:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-core:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-dialog-basic:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-dialog-scxml:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-dialog:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-mailreader-jpa:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-mailreader:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-parent:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-remoting:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-spring:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-sql-browser:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-test-core:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-test-dialog-basic:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-test-dialog-scxml:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-test-tiger:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-blank:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-test-view:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-tiger:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-usecases:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-validator:1.0.5
>  org.apache.shale:shale-view:1.0.5
> 
> (3) The release artifacts are available here:
> 
>  http://people.apache.org/builds/shale/shale-1.0.5/dist/
> 
> mailreader-jpa-1.0.5.zip
> shale-blank-1.0.5.zip
> shale-clay-usecases-1.0.5.zip
> shale-framework-1.0.5.zip
> shale-mailreader-1.0.5.zip
> shale-mailreader-jpa-1.0.5.zip
> shale-sql-browser-1.0.5.zip
> shale-test-core-1.0.5.zip
> shale-test-dialog-basic-1.0.5.zip
> shale-test-dialog-scxml-1.0.5.zip
> shale-test-tiger-1.0.5.zip
> shale-test-view-1.0.5.zip
> shale-usecases-1.0.5.zip
> 
> (4) The release notes are here, for ready reference:
> 
>  http://people.apache.org/~greddin/release-notes-1.0.5.html
> 
> (5) Vote
> 
> Please review these artifacts, signatures and checksums, and vote
> whether we should release them as Apache Shale version 1.0.5.
> 
> --8<--------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 (Binding) for PMC members only
> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released
> ------------------------------------------------
> 
> A quality vote (per module, where necessary) will be held later on if
> this passes.
> 
> Thank you!!
> Greg
>