Mailing-List: contact dev-help@shale.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@shale.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wsmoak@gmail.com designates
 209.85.132.246 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=c6yMd+uL+NC2V2Mf7lYtglouna05qEuamj6LAnbnk6jes8V4QDzvANFS46520o97r3XacTny4dECRdkK3Eke6hllI1QmdnKJQOn223ZwPr1Vuz6/nwawOVkNriZ6ilGz+wt8glqbC4uR2+ikWtW1qUtCcNIEhgOHpyqjyeBAFpk=
Message-ID: <adba96190801140833u1a2f5399xe176114e041fdddf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:33:36 -0700
From: "Wendy Smoak" <wsmoak@gmail.com>
To: dev@shale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [clay] Clay: possible subproject of Tiles?
In-Reply-To: <aae96ca0801140759w79149d17j4a2f15f2763b99ed@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <aae96ca0801140759w79149d17j4a2f15f2763b99ed@mail.gmail.com>

On Jan 14, 2008 8:59 AM, Antonio Petrelli <antonio.petrelli@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all (and in particular Gary VanMatre).
> Now that Shale is being dismantled, I think that Clay could live as a
> subproject of Tiles, since its primary goal is to work with templates.
> I think that both projects could benefit from each other, though Clay
> is tightly connected to JSF.

I actually don't think Shale is going anywhere... what seems more
likely is that we'll "retire" bits of it (like the Tiles integration)
in favor of other things that already exist, and _maybe_ split up the
distribution so things can be released separately as people are
interested in them.

-- 
Wendy