shale-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Niall Pemberton" <niall.pember...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Mirror v104? (was: RESULT ...)
Date Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:23:18 GMT
On 1/12/07, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com> wrote:
> This ones thoroughly OT, sorry list.
>
> On 1/11/07, Niall Pemberton <niall.pemberton@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 1/11/07, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com> wrote:
> <snip/>
> > >
> > > Here is the relevant recent example I mentioned in the last post ( [1]
> >
> > The quality grade in that initial post is in the title "[VOTE] Release
> > build 6.0.7 as alpha" - so they are doing the same as Struts - voting
> > on an initial release as "alpha" quality. I assume the second post is
> > then a vote to either keep it as alpha or upgrade it to beta.
> >
> <snap/>
>
> Indeed, got that. And the two reasons you state [A] where voting twice
> is not necessary also make good sense. But, is the above the same as
> the Struts process ATM? I seem to remember a 2.0.1 quality vote and
> now talk of 2.0.3, but no vote at all for 2.0.2 (I may have just
> missed it, if so, sorry).

AFAIK 2.0.2 was only ever a test build and not a release. I haven't
followed s2 too closely but I believe the fact that it depended on
unreleased XWork meant that it was never going to go GA - so the plan
changed to getting xwork out and then doing a 2.0.3

Niall

> -Rahul
>
> [A] http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Why-vote-twice-for-a-release-quality--p4246751.html
>
>
> > Niall
> >
> > > followed by [2] in a couple of weeks ) from tomcat's (recently
> > > improved) process. If and when I RM another Shale release, it will
> > > come with a quality marker to begin with (might as well be alpha, but
> > > mentioned explicitly). I prefer a release vote over a test build (that
> > > was not voted on).
> > >
> > > In any case, let me get back to completing the v1.0.4 release tasks.
> > > Many thanks for your input.
> > >
> > > -Rahul
> >
> > > [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-dev&m=116695917620851&w=2
> > > [2] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-dev&m=116801203312451&w=2
> > >
>

Mime
View raw message