shale-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gregg Leichtman <g...@erols.com>
Subject Re: [FWD: [v1.0.4] shale-tiles and release notes (was Re: svn commit: r490857 ...)]
Date Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:30:36 GMT
In that case, to avoid duplicating information, what about putting a one sentence blurb in
the release notes referencing that file and the version information it contains?

Due to my inexperience with Maven, I would not have known to look in that location for version
info.

                                -=> Gregg <=-


hermod.opstvedt@dnbnor.no wrote:
> Hi
>
> These are listed in the various profiles in the Maven POM file.
>
> Hermod
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gregg Leichtman [mailto:gsl1@erols.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 12:56 PM
> To: dev@shale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FWD: [v1.0.4] shale-tiles and release notes (was Re: svn
> commit: r490857 ...)]
>
>
> Just a suggestion. It would be helpful, to me at least, if you were to
> include within the release notes one or more snapshot version numbers of
> standalone Tiles, one or more version numbers of Spring and one or more
> version numbers of other targeted components that work with Shale with
> which you the development group believes v1.0.4 appears to work. I
> realize that items like Tiles in sandboxes are fast moving targets, but
> it helps us users avoid having to do a lot of trial and error just to
> find a single combination of components that works. If we have one
> working set, substituting different components one at a time using trial
> and error during component upgrades is far less burdensome that not
> knowing anything about what works together.
>
>                                                               -=> Gregg <=-
>
> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>   
>> On 12/29/06, Greg Reddin <greddin@apache.org> wrote:
>>     
>>>>> From: "Rahul Akolkar" <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Thu, December 28, 2006 4:56 pm
>>>>> To: commits@shale.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>> The above "projected quality" paragraph needs to be updated to
>>>>>           
>>> reflect
>>>       
>>>>> the current sentiment. Of the two items in that list, 1.0.4 will
>>>>> address most of the dialog issues (so I've removed that).
>>>>>
>>>>> Someone more familiar with shale-tiles (and changes implied by going
>>>>> TLP) should update the above paragraph in the release notes. TIA.
>>>>>           
>>>
>>> The TLP hasn't changed the status of Tiles just yet.  Tiles will
>>> still be a
>>> snapshot for a while because it will take some time to get the TLP
>>> infrastructure set up.
>>>
>>>       
>> <snip/>
>>
>> Thanks, the related bits are in section 1 and 4 of the release notes
>> -- you're welcome (as is everyone else) to tweak the wording (long,
>> possibly fragmented URL):
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shale/framework/trunk/src/site/resources/docs/release-notes-1.0.4.html
>>
>>
>> -Rahul
>>
>>
>>     
>>> Greg
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>
>
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> This email with attachments is solely for the use of the individual or
> entity to whom it is addressed. Please also be aware that the DnB NOR Group
> cannot accept any payment orders or other legally binding correspondence with
> customers as a part of an email. 
>
> This email message has been virus checked by the anti virus programs used
> in the DnB NOR Group.
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
>   


Mime
View raw message