Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-servicemix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-servicemix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8B31114B2 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31904 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2014 14:35:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-servicemix-dev-archive@servicemix.apache.org Received: (qmail 31865 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2014 14:35:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@servicemix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@servicemix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@servicemix.apache.org Received: (qmail 31853 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2014 14:35:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:35:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.177] (HELO mail-wi0-f177.google.com) (209.85.212.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:35:43 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ho1so2663127wib.4 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 07:35:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=ovUrfG7aOdhavJ0eu8+01tkXGsFbUoPdPziEuDFMSUc=; b=wPAVRacEfAYL9hpIFcjhSYhs+EIM9tw93wnbwNi+QoTMiJ+ihr5W00RCZqZVMQqQVh JakmeZYnG0njrG3I4LT8Ee55kNzSKO5eF0HyQDE7s6ucUos+dv8BUwQWtjT3lIbrPuXU INY41qeeiaU/RaJZn6SKNqFu68dG66a1ziHoU6iXzGKZcKzZq8B8TT9rLw74nTtzoCN7 MWx5B0M/ik6hHVOj9EoceWZKuMy95uBkxmBfnSLUvaPjx/1mci9fN1XzFl+7sd4EUy7w wZenwFvTdMbm+OjRnL2O21ZMXkWOCAttl409GCReC5PF7vCow4rCIpvEtE6glEQFc5jX K+bg== X-Received: by 10.180.82.97 with SMTP id h1mr24726905wiy.30.1405348520084; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 07:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.13] (093105176034.unknown.vectranet.pl. [93.105.176.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cj8sm25895596wjb.5.2014.07.14.07.35.18 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Jul 2014 07:35:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53C3EAA6.6030203@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 16:35:18 +0200 From: Krzysztof Sobkowiak User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@servicemix.apache.org Subject: Re: Planning a 5.0.3 and 5.1.1 release? References: <53C3B54E.6060100@gmail.com> <53C3C645.1080604@nanthrax.net> In-Reply-To: <53C3C645.1080604@nanthrax.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080604080802030209080802" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------080604080802030209080802 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Could you please prepare the branch for 5.2.x and the version in JIRA? When you prepare the new branch do you use the maven release:update-versions to change the version? Best regards Krzysztof On 14.07.2014 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > It sounds good to me. > > Karaf 2.3.6 and 2.4.0 should be available soon (something like > beginning of next week). > Karaf 3.0.2 is planned just after (end of next week). > > regards > JB > > On 07/14/2014 12:47 PM, Sobkowiak, Krzysztof wrote: >> +1 for SMX 5.0.3 and 5.1.1 with current code base and 5.0.4 and 5.1.2 >> with Karaf 2.3.6. >> +1 for SMX 5.2.x with Karaf 2.4.0 >> >> With SMX 6 we should wait until Karaf 3.0.2 is available and contains >> the fix for the deploy folder problem. >> >> Best regards >> Krzysztof >> >> >> On 14.07.2014 12:28, Gert Vanthienen wrote: >>> L.S., >>> >>> >>> It's not that a lot has happened on ServiceMix itself since the >>> previous 5.0.2 and 5.1.0 releases, but the upgrades of Camel and CXF >>> probably mean more to our user base than anything else. Doing a >>> release isn't that much of an effort these days, so I think it makes >>> sense to plan to do 5.0.3 and 5.1.1 release (perhaps later this week >>> or early next week). Wdyt? >>> >>> Also, with a Karaf 2.4.0 in the works, we should probably also start >>> getting ready to provide a corresponding ServiceMix release once >>> that's out. In my mind, that's too big an upgrade to do in a >>> micro/bugfix release, so perhaps we should set up a 5.2.x branch to >>> work on that? >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Gert Vanthienen >> > -- Krzysztof Sobkowiak JEE & OSS Architect | Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini | Committer @ ASF Capgemini | Software Solutions Center | Wroclaw e-mail: krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com | Twitter: @KSobkowiak Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC --------------080604080802030209080802--