servicemix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Krzysztof Sobkowiak (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SM-2324) Use JcaPooledConnectionFactory instead of XaPooledConnectionFactory
Date Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:34:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14062605#comment-14062605
] 

Krzysztof Sobkowiak commented on SM-2324:
-----------------------------------------

I'm just testing it.

> Use JcaPooledConnectionFactory instead of XaPooledConnectionFactory
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SM-2324
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2324
>             Project: ServiceMix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 5.1.0
>            Reporter: Benjamin Graf
>            Assignee: Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Later
>
>         Attachments: vcs-diff4244289734753098047.patch
>
>
> I'm thinking of using JcaPooledConnectionFactory instead of XaPooledConnectionFactory
is better since geronimo transaction wants named resources for internal handling which are
not provided by the xa factory. Btw is recovery working without jca factory used? Why is the
connection count limited to 1?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message