servicemix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Benjamin Graf (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SM-2324) Use JcaPooledConnectionFactory instead of XaPooledConnectionFactory
Date Mon, 14 Jul 2014 18:50:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14061018#comment-14061018
] 

Benjamin Graf commented on SM-2324:
-----------------------------------

Any reason not to solve this in one of the following releases?

> Use JcaPooledConnectionFactory instead of XaPooledConnectionFactory
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SM-2324
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2324
>             Project: ServiceMix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 5.1.0
>            Reporter: Benjamin Graf
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Later
>
>         Attachments: vcs-diff4244289734753098047.patch
>
>
> I'm thinking of using JcaPooledConnectionFactory instead of XaPooledConnectionFactory
is better since geronimo transaction wants named resources for internal handling which are
not provided by the xa factory. Btw is recovery working without jca factory used? Why is the
connection count limited to 1?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message