Mailing-List: contact dev-help@servicemix.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@servicemix.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <506C8CB7.5090509@nanthrax.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 21:06:31 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jean-Baptiste_Onofr=E9?= <jb@nanthrax.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:15.0) Gecko/20120912 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@servicemix.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using Karaf 2.2.9 for the 4.5.0 release?
References: 
 <CACAPQZ5k0+0QROXCEG7QGX2EXrJn6uWdR2yTQKFtofeKHU7dXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <506C6BB3.1080705@nanthrax.net>
 <CACAPQZ5OyG52qHRq0LMcVYng7KJeJmrUgrd=qxAiD_AfCOBK0w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CACAPQZ5OyG52qHRq0LMcVYng7KJeJmrUgrd=qxAiD_AfCOBK0w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

FYI, xbean 3.12 release is in vote.

I think it's safer to stay with Karaf 2.2.x for 4.5.0, in order to avoid=20
to postpone 4.5.0 for too long.

Regards
JB

On 10/03/2012 08:48 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> L.S.,
>
>
> Given the new features that Jamie mentioned, I couldn't resist the
> temptation to at least give the upgrade to Karaf 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT a shot
> locally, but I quickly bumped into an issue with XBean: it looks like
> xbean-blueprint is currently importing Aries' Blueprint classes with a
> version range of (0.3,1.0] so we will need to get that fixed up first
> and get the ActiveMQ features descriptor updated to the new XBean
> release before we can consider moving to Karaf 2.3.0.
>
> As soon as our release has been cut, we should move to Karaf 2.3.0 to
> ensure we start ironing out these kinds of incompatibilities as soon
> as possible.  For now, I'll just raise a JIRA issue to keep track of
> the required changes in XBean.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofr=E9 <jb@nanthrax.net=
> wrote:
>> Hi Gert,
>>
>> IMHO, it makes sense to release 4.5.0 with 2.2.9 as we planned some we=
eks
>> ago (including the CXF/ActiveMQ/Camel versions).
>>
>> As soon as Karaf 2.3.0, we can prepare a 4.6.0.
>>
>> I think it would be a good sign to the community to have new releases =
;)
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 10/03/2012 04:56 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>>
>>> L.S.,
>>>
>>>
>>> As a preparation for the 4.5.0 release, I created JIRA issue
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-1257 - I initially picked
>>> version 2.3.0 of Karaf based on a recent mail by Claus on the dev@
>>> list, but perhaps it would be better to go with the latest Karaf 2.2.=
9
>>> release instead.
>>>
>>> We already have the NMR and Features building against that version of
>>> Karaf, so if we don't change that any more, we can start working on
>>> our 4.5.0 release as soon as ActiveMQ 5.7.0 is available - there's a
>>> new VOTE thread running for that at the moment, so we might even be
>>> able to get everything ready and released this month.  We have been
>>> talking about doing this Apache ServiceMix 4.5.0 release since the en=
d
>>> of May, so I would rather try and get it out as soon as possible.
>>>
>>> After all, we can always do a 4.6.0 release once Karaf 2.3.0 (or even
>>> Karaf 3.0.0) is out ;)
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>> ------------------------
>>> FuseSource
>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofr=E9
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com

--=20
Jean-Baptiste Onofr=E9
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com