servicemix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jeff Yu (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SM-1090) JBI 1.0 compatibility layer: Offline tool to transform JBI artifacts in OSGi bundles
Date Wed, 02 Jan 2008 09:52:43 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=40964#action_40964
] 

Jeff Yu commented on SM-1090:
-----------------------------

I'd like the 2nd solution, we can keep an separate directory for storing "pure JBI artifacts",
and then if users want to deploy the JBI artifact, then just simply copy it to the JBI-specific
folder, and that's all. JBI offline tool for users are transparent.
I have following user scenarios in my mind.
* Users would use OSGi OBR to install the sharedlibrary & component from Gshell console.
* Users would deploy their own SA, and simply copy it to the JBI-specific folder.

and that's all.

Any potential problems or cons on this approach??

> JBI 1.0 compatibility layer: Offline tool to transform JBI artifacts in OSGi bundles
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SM-1090
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1090
>             Project: ServiceMix
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
>            Assignee: Jeff Yu
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>         Attachments: SM-1090.patch, SM-1090.patch
>
>


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message