servicemix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Janne Savukoski" <>
Subject Re: SOAP binding/serialization
Date Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:00:16 GMT
Np with the delay, I'm surviving fine with my patches. :) I thought
the case might be something like this and the soap2 looked really
promising. No need to hurry, at least just for me. As my patches work
for now, I can wait for an actual release. And I /urge/ you not to
waste any time on expanding the soon-to-be-legacy soap-component.

Btw., what's the status with xfire?

> From: "Guillaume Nodet" <>
> Sorry to answer with such a delay.
> The wsdl11 wrapper is not supported yet, this is one of the purpose of
> the new soap2 module.  The consumer part is in a usable state
> and I have something ready to commit on the provider side, but I'm waiting
> for some recent jetty snapshots to be published (I guess I will upload
> some to our private repo soon).
> So I'm not really at ease with changing the current endpoints to add
> a non complete support for the wsdl 1.1 wrapper ...
> If you want to test it, I can commit the work I did on the provider endpoint
> ...
> On 3/29/07, Janne Savukoski <> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I had some issues with soap messages not being serialized properly,
> > header/body handling (binding) etc. I'm using the wsdl11-wrapping and
> > I don't know if it has something to do with this. Anyways, at least it
> > looks like the binding stuff is being discarded at
> > org.apache.servicemix.http.HttpEndpoint:228, but I don't know if the
> > part handling (soap binding) was occurring before that; although, the
> > end-results weren't suggesting so. (All parts were serialized to the
> > soap body, or something.) So I hacked up this little patch which does
> > the part handling. Diffs attached. Best effort -kind of stuff, works
> > for me. Just if anyone else is interested.. Though, I didn't quite get
> > what HttpEndpoint#overrideDefinition was trying to do so that hack may
> > be a little conflicting.. (see the httpendpoint-patch.)
> >
> > I'd also like to know if this would somehow work without the patch as
> > patches are a bit annoying. :)
> >
> > (There also appears to be some major stuff coming in the soap2-module,
> > but it seemed a little incomplete so I didn't take a closer look.)
> >
> > Btw., I guess the soap-headers of the reply message are being
> > forwarded correctly?

View raw message