servicemix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SM-888) In the Drool 3.1 component is not possible to specify a default target service
Date Fri, 06 Apr 2007 19:08:34 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_38979
] 

Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-888:
------------------------------------

I'm thinking that we could use the full uri instead of the service QName, that would allow
for more possibiliites.

However, isn't that feature natively handled by a rule put at the bottom of the DRL like this
one:
{code}
rule "Default routing rule"
	when
		me : Exchange( status == Exchange.ACTIVE, in : in != null )
	then
		jbi.route( "service:ns:svc" );
end
{code}

I'm wondering about the actual need for this patch ?
What do you think ?

> In the Drool 3.1 component is not possible to specify a default target service
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SM-888
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-888
>             Project: ServiceMix
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: servicemix-drools
>    Affects Versions: 3.1
>            Reporter: Andrea Zoppello
>         Attachments: DroolsEndpoint.java.diff, DroolsEndpoint.java.diff
>
>
> It can be util to specify a  default "target service" where the  message will be routed
if no one of the
> rule specified in thre rulebase file has been executed

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message