Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-servicemix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 95384 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2007 14:21:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2007 14:21:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 16127 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2007 14:21:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-servicemix-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 15946 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2007 14:21:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact servicemix-dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 15937 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2007 14:21:10 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:21:10 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of gnodet@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.187 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.187] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:20:59 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so593466nfc for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:20:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=C9Vbh/MazSxXmKOoKwYgyztX//gNSaQp3Uvty16AhN9TyRm3rXzE+MXBq5Ky3NFXReCfVqehXhxmfF+1OCWjrfOqbglGWz+qU6PRmm22sSiowZkLG+mURuPqevR+kBd9A0CdtCU62xhXQxDgEHGLqhPO/HKB89lq8X+oQFrIdn8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=dBmMXvE+ZsimTH6jebCrxjK1eShNocLx2GaXeMaRpzz4Q8KDIEnsY5NVclet3suQhX3XZx63mcZ/m1bUFHyxPNkAIEdwG4jiS6kVr13WsykG+tIS6zLg3Z/ScQcwDD63cR6NS0tMCi8uk9MAEl3dmodvFKAADIri5xflyKl9x3Q= Received: by 10.82.187.16 with SMTP id k16mr791839buf.1173363637288; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:20:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.151.1 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 06:20:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 15:20:37 +0100 From: "Guillaume Nodet" To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Message Store Mechanism! In-Reply-To: <9374168.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_130225_18266828.1173363637056" References: <9374168.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_130225_18266828.1173363637056 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ServiceMix uses ActiveMQ to provide persistence, failover and load-balancing ... ActiveMQ has several strategies for actually persisting messages. On 3/8/07, goldi wrote: > > > Hi everybody, > > does ServiceMix implements a Message Store Mechanism, as it JBossESB does? > > Greets goldi > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Message-Store-Mechanism%21-tf3369118s12049.html#a9374168 > Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/) Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------=_Part_130225_18266828.1173363637056--