sdap-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [REPORT] Please review
Date Thu, 05 Sep 2019 13:25:25 GMT
Great- I think its lunch after Brian's talk- let's all plan on meeting
there then we can go somewhere and grab a bite.

tg


On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 1:20 AM Julian Feinauer <j.feinauer@pragmaticminds.de>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I joined the sdap list a while back when you were looking for Mentors and
> help for the initial release.
> Since then I became IPMC member so I could also offer you to support in
> the release (and, if still needed) as mentor as well.
>
> I will also be at ACNA so would be nice to get in contact and chat there!
>
> Julian
>
> Am 04.09.19, 22:49 schrieb "Trevor Grant" <trevor.d.grant@gmail.com>:
>
>     Cool.
>
>     Brian's talk is at the same time I'm supposed to be in / moderating
> the IoT
>     room, but I'm going to try to sneak away for an hour to see that.
>
>     Justin will be speaking first up in the IoT track so we can catch up
> with
>     him down and chat there about release requirements. There are other
>     non-Java Apache projects but I also I've heard what non-incubator
> projects
>     are allow to grandfather in vs what incubator projects must do can
>     sometimes be different.
>
>     Re: wiki- I don't know- I've just asked on the incubator slack
> channel, but
>     haven't had a response yet.  Do what you think is best(?) if I hear
>     something on there I'll respond.
>
>     tg
>
>
>
>     On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:18 PM Frank Greguska <fgreg@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>     > Thanks Trevor.
>     >
>     > Since there are no further comments and deadline for submission is
> today, I
>     > am comfortable with submitting this report. Am I supposed to edit
> the wiki
>     > directly?
>     >
>     > wrt your questions:
>     > I believe Brian Wilson is planning on attending ApacheCon and
> talking about
>     > SDAP and is currently working on putting together materials.
>     > I think we're ok with a 1.0 release because this version of the code
> is
>     > running in a few different places. The main problem with the release
> at
>     > this point is understanding and complying with all the legal
> requirements
>     > Apache has to call it a release. Also the fact that we're not
> releasing all
>     > components to Maven (because they aren't Java components) makes
>     > understanding the Apache release requirements documentation
> challenging.
>     > Most of our release artifacts are actually docker images but we were
> told
>     > we cannot push unreleased docker images to dockerhub, and it's still
>     > unclear what the process is then for releasing artifacts that are
> not JAR
>     > files. This is the discussion that was kicked off due to that issue:
>     >
>     >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9cdc55e46a6fe23e1c0fcbdee6032f4949572311b0ded10cf6353be0@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
>     > but I did not have time to follow it entirely. Re-reading it now it
> seems
>     > that there is still a bit of an open question as to what we're
> actually
>     > supposed to do.
>     >
>     > - Frank
>     >
>     > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:47 AM Trevor Grant <
> trevor.d.grant@gmail.com>
>     > wrote:
>     >
>     > > This looks good- thanks Frank.
>     > >
>     > > Improving/creating docs is always hard.  It might be advisable to
> find
>     > > someone who can work on this and give them committer rights (I'm
> seeing
>     > one
>     > > hasn't been added since Feb, not horrible, but we want to keep
> growing
>     > the
>     > > community).  Improved docs will lead to more user adoption, which
> will
>     > > create more committer incentives and a pool of people to draw
> from.  Sort
>     > > of a chicken and egg problem.
>     > >
>     > > Has there been any advocacy for the project? (e.g. are there any
> talks
>     > > coming up at Apache Con to get people interested? If not maybe a
>     > lightning
>     > > talk? Also blog posts). Advocacy can kick start the previously
> mentioned
>     > > feedback loop.
>     > >
>     > > I'm seeing that we're pushing for v1.0 - i know ASF wide that is
> the
>     > thing
>     > > everyone is pushing for, however it's probably OK to do a v0.x
> release
>     > > first just to get the ball moving (in fact probably should have a
> 0.x
>     > > release first to check for bugs before pushing 1.0, just my two
> cents).
>     > >
>     > > This is looking good and I'm signing off, those are my comments.
>     > >
>     > >
>     > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:07 AM Frank Greguska <fgreg@apache.org>
> wrote:
>     > >
>     > > > Hello,
>     > > >
>     > > > Please review the Podling report for SDAP below:
>     > > >
>     > > >
>     > > > SDAP
>     > > >
>     > > > SDAP is an integrated data analytic framework for Big Science
> problems.
>     > > >
>     > > > SDAP has been incubating since 2017-10-22.
>     > > >
>     > > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards
> graduation:
>     > > >
>     > > >  1. Make official SDAP (Incubating) Release
>     > > >  2. Improve/create user guide documentation
>     > > >  3. Improve committer participation
>     > > >
>     > > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need
> to be
>     > > > aware of?
>     > > >
>     > > > No.
>     > > >
>     > > > How has the community developed since the last report?
>     > > >
>     > > > We are continuing to attract new committers.
>     > > >
>     > > > How has the project developed since the last report?
>     > > >
>     > > > SDAP is still working towards its first release. Work towards a
>     > > repeatable
>     > > > build pipeline has been started.
>     > > >
>     > > > New functionality has been added to the Distributed Oceanographic
>     > Matchup
>     > > > Service (DOMS) and Extensible Data Gateway Environment (EDGE)
>     > components
>     > > > that allow for filtering in situ measurements by a standardized
> quality
>     > > > flag.
>     > > >
>     > > > How would you assess the podling's maturity?
>     > > >
>     > > > There are several deployments of SDAP actively being used and
> interest
>     > is
>     > > > high. However, active participation from project members is low.
> A push
>     > > is
>     > > > needed to cross the t's and dot the i's in regards to meeting the
>     > > > requirements Apache has for releasing software so that we can
> claim a
>     > 1.0
>     > > > version of SDAP.
>     > > >
>     > > > Please feel free to add your own commentary.
>     > > >
>     > > >   [X] Initial setup
>     > > >   [X] Working towards first release
>     > > >   [X] Community building
>     > > >   [ ] Nearing graduation
>     > > >
>     > > > Date of last release:
>     > > >
>     > > >   XXXX-XX-XX
>     > > >
>     > > > When were the last committers or PPMC members elected?
>     > > >
>     > > > Maya Debellis was elected as a committer on 2019-02-08
>     > > >
>     > > > Have your mentors been helpful and responsive or are things
> falling
>     > > > through the cracks? In the latter case, please list any open
> issues
>     > > > that need to be addressed.
>     > > >
>     > > > Yes, mentors have been helpful and responsive.
>     > > >
>     > > > Signed-off-by:
>     > > >
>     > > >   [ ](sdap) Jörn Kottmann
>     > > >      Comments:
>     > > >   [ ](sdap) Trevor Grant
>     > > >      Comments:
>     > > >   [ ](sdap) Lewis John McGibbney
>     > > >      Comments:
>     > > >
>     > >
>     >
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message