sdap-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [REPORT] Please review
Date Wed, 04 Sep 2019 20:49:37 GMT
Cool.

Brian's talk is at the same time I'm supposed to be in / moderating the IoT
room, but I'm going to try to sneak away for an hour to see that.

Justin will be speaking first up in the IoT track so we can catch up with
him down and chat there about release requirements. There are other
non-Java Apache projects but I also I've heard what non-incubator projects
are allow to grandfather in vs what incubator projects must do can
sometimes be different.

Re: wiki- I don't know- I've just asked on the incubator slack channel, but
haven't had a response yet.  Do what you think is best(?) if I hear
something on there I'll respond.

tg



On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:18 PM Frank Greguska <fgreg@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks Trevor.
>
> Since there are no further comments and deadline for submission is today, I
> am comfortable with submitting this report. Am I supposed to edit the wiki
> directly?
>
> wrt your questions:
> I believe Brian Wilson is planning on attending ApacheCon and talking about
> SDAP and is currently working on putting together materials.
> I think we're ok with a 1.0 release because this version of the code is
> running in a few different places. The main problem with the release at
> this point is understanding and complying with all the legal requirements
> Apache has to call it a release. Also the fact that we're not releasing all
> components to Maven (because they aren't Java components) makes
> understanding the Apache release requirements documentation challenging.
> Most of our release artifacts are actually docker images but we were told
> we cannot push unreleased docker images to dockerhub, and it's still
> unclear what the process is then for releasing artifacts that are not JAR
> files. This is the discussion that was kicked off due to that issue:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9cdc55e46a6fe23e1c0fcbdee6032f4949572311b0ded10cf6353be0@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> but I did not have time to follow it entirely. Re-reading it now it seems
> that there is still a bit of an open question as to what we're actually
> supposed to do.
>
> - Frank
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:47 AM Trevor Grant <trevor.d.grant@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This looks good- thanks Frank.
> >
> > Improving/creating docs is always hard.  It might be advisable to find
> > someone who can work on this and give them committer rights (I'm seeing
> one
> > hasn't been added since Feb, not horrible, but we want to keep growing
> the
> > community).  Improved docs will lead to more user adoption, which will
> > create more committer incentives and a pool of people to draw from.  Sort
> > of a chicken and egg problem.
> >
> > Has there been any advocacy for the project? (e.g. are there any talks
> > coming up at Apache Con to get people interested? If not maybe a
> lightning
> > talk? Also blog posts). Advocacy can kick start the previously mentioned
> > feedback loop.
> >
> > I'm seeing that we're pushing for v1.0 - i know ASF wide that is the
> thing
> > everyone is pushing for, however it's probably OK to do a v0.x release
> > first just to get the ball moving (in fact probably should have a 0.x
> > release first to check for bugs before pushing 1.0, just my two cents).
> >
> > This is looking good and I'm signing off, those are my comments.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:07 AM Frank Greguska <fgreg@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Please review the Podling report for SDAP below:
> > >
> > >
> > > SDAP
> > >
> > > SDAP is an integrated data analytic framework for Big Science problems.
> > >
> > > SDAP has been incubating since 2017-10-22.
> > >
> > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
> > >
> > >  1. Make official SDAP (Incubating) Release
> > >  2. Improve/create user guide documentation
> > >  3. Improve committer participation
> > >
> > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> > > aware of?
> > >
> > > No.
> > >
> > > How has the community developed since the last report?
> > >
> > > We are continuing to attract new committers.
> > >
> > > How has the project developed since the last report?
> > >
> > > SDAP is still working towards its first release. Work towards a
> > repeatable
> > > build pipeline has been started.
> > >
> > > New functionality has been added to the Distributed Oceanographic
> Matchup
> > > Service (DOMS) and Extensible Data Gateway Environment (EDGE)
> components
> > > that allow for filtering in situ measurements by a standardized quality
> > > flag.
> > >
> > > How would you assess the podling's maturity?
> > >
> > > There are several deployments of SDAP actively being used and interest
> is
> > > high. However, active participation from project members is low. A push
> > is
> > > needed to cross the t's and dot the i's in regards to meeting the
> > > requirements Apache has for releasing software so that we can claim a
> 1.0
> > > version of SDAP.
> > >
> > > Please feel free to add your own commentary.
> > >
> > >   [X] Initial setup
> > >   [X] Working towards first release
> > >   [X] Community building
> > >   [ ] Nearing graduation
> > >
> > > Date of last release:
> > >
> > >   XXXX-XX-XX
> > >
> > > When were the last committers or PPMC members elected?
> > >
> > > Maya Debellis was elected as a committer on 2019-02-08
> > >
> > > Have your mentors been helpful and responsive or are things falling
> > > through the cracks? In the latter case, please list any open issues
> > > that need to be addressed.
> > >
> > > Yes, mentors have been helpful and responsive.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by:
> > >
> > >   [ ](sdap) Jörn Kottmann
> > >      Comments:
> > >   [ ](sdap) Trevor Grant
> > >      Comments:
> > >   [ ](sdap) Lewis John McGibbney
> > >      Comments:
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message