sdap-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Frank Greguska <fg...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [REPORT] Please review
Date Mon, 09 Sep 2019 05:47:38 GMT
Last minute change of plans, I'll be giving the talk on SDAP tomorrow.
Looking forward to meeting you all.

- Frank

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:25 AM Trevor Grant <trevor.d.grant@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Great- I think its lunch after Brian's talk- let's all plan on meeting
> there then we can go somewhere and grab a bite.
>
> tg
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 1:20 AM Julian Feinauer <
> j.feinauer@pragmaticminds.de>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I joined the sdap list a while back when you were looking for Mentors and
> > help for the initial release.
> > Since then I became IPMC member so I could also offer you to support in
> > the release (and, if still needed) as mentor as well.
> >
> > I will also be at ACNA so would be nice to get in contact and chat there!
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > Am 04.09.19, 22:49 schrieb "Trevor Grant" <trevor.d.grant@gmail.com>:
> >
> >     Cool.
> >
> >     Brian's talk is at the same time I'm supposed to be in / moderating
> > the IoT
> >     room, but I'm going to try to sneak away for an hour to see that.
> >
> >     Justin will be speaking first up in the IoT track so we can catch up
> > with
> >     him down and chat there about release requirements. There are other
> >     non-Java Apache projects but I also I've heard what non-incubator
> > projects
> >     are allow to grandfather in vs what incubator projects must do can
> >     sometimes be different.
> >
> >     Re: wiki- I don't know- I've just asked on the incubator slack
> > channel, but
> >     haven't had a response yet.  Do what you think is best(?) if I hear
> >     something on there I'll respond.
> >
> >     tg
> >
> >
> >
> >     On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:18 PM Frank Greguska <fgreg@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >     > Thanks Trevor.
> >     >
> >     > Since there are no further comments and deadline for submission is
> > today, I
> >     > am comfortable with submitting this report. Am I supposed to edit
> > the wiki
> >     > directly?
> >     >
> >     > wrt your questions:
> >     > I believe Brian Wilson is planning on attending ApacheCon and
> > talking about
> >     > SDAP and is currently working on putting together materials.
> >     > I think we're ok with a 1.0 release because this version of the
> code
> > is
> >     > running in a few different places. The main problem with the
> release
> > at
> >     > this point is understanding and complying with all the legal
> > requirements
> >     > Apache has to call it a release. Also the fact that we're not
> > releasing all
> >     > components to Maven (because they aren't Java components) makes
> >     > understanding the Apache release requirements documentation
> > challenging.
> >     > Most of our release artifacts are actually docker images but we
> were
> > told
> >     > we cannot push unreleased docker images to dockerhub, and it's
> still
> >     > unclear what the process is then for releasing artifacts that are
> > not JAR
> >     > files. This is the discussion that was kicked off due to that
> issue:
> >     >
> >     >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9cdc55e46a6fe23e1c0fcbdee6032f4949572311b0ded10cf6353be0@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> >     > but I did not have time to follow it entirely. Re-reading it now it
> > seems
> >     > that there is still a bit of an open question as to what we're
> > actually
> >     > supposed to do.
> >     >
> >     > - Frank
> >     >
> >     > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:47 AM Trevor Grant <
> > trevor.d.grant@gmail.com>
> >     > wrote:
> >     >
> >     > > This looks good- thanks Frank.
> >     > >
> >     > > Improving/creating docs is always hard.  It might be advisable to
> > find
> >     > > someone who can work on this and give them committer rights (I'm
> > seeing
> >     > one
> >     > > hasn't been added since Feb, not horrible, but we want to keep
> > growing
> >     > the
> >     > > community).  Improved docs will lead to more user adoption, which
> > will
> >     > > create more committer incentives and a pool of people to draw
> > from.  Sort
> >     > > of a chicken and egg problem.
> >     > >
> >     > > Has there been any advocacy for the project? (e.g. are there any
> > talks
> >     > > coming up at Apache Con to get people interested? If not maybe a
> >     > lightning
> >     > > talk? Also blog posts). Advocacy can kick start the previously
> > mentioned
> >     > > feedback loop.
> >     > >
> >     > > I'm seeing that we're pushing for v1.0 - i know ASF wide that is
> > the
> >     > thing
> >     > > everyone is pushing for, however it's probably OK to do a v0.x
> > release
> >     > > first just to get the ball moving (in fact probably should have a
> > 0.x
> >     > > release first to check for bugs before pushing 1.0, just my two
> > cents).
> >     > >
> >     > > This is looking good and I'm signing off, those are my comments.
> >     > >
> >     > >
> >     > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:07 AM Frank Greguska <fgreg@apache.org
> >
> > wrote:
> >     > >
> >     > > > Hello,
> >     > > >
> >     > > > Please review the Podling report for SDAP below:
> >     > > >
> >     > > >
> >     > > > SDAP
> >     > > >
> >     > > > SDAP is an integrated data analytic framework for Big Science
> > problems.
> >     > > >
> >     > > > SDAP has been incubating since 2017-10-22.
> >     > > >
> >     > > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards
> > graduation:
> >     > > >
> >     > > >  1. Make official SDAP (Incubating) Release
> >     > > >  2. Improve/create user guide documentation
> >     > > >  3. Improve committer participation
> >     > > >
> >     > > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need
> > to be
> >     > > > aware of?
> >     > > >
> >     > > > No.
> >     > > >
> >     > > > How has the community developed since the last report?
> >     > > >
> >     > > > We are continuing to attract new committers.
> >     > > >
> >     > > > How has the project developed since the last report?
> >     > > >
> >     > > > SDAP is still working towards its first release. Work towards
a
> >     > > repeatable
> >     > > > build pipeline has been started.
> >     > > >
> >     > > > New functionality has been added to the Distributed
> Oceanographic
> >     > Matchup
> >     > > > Service (DOMS) and Extensible Data Gateway Environment (EDGE)
> >     > components
> >     > > > that allow for filtering in situ measurements by a standardized
> > quality
> >     > > > flag.
> >     > > >
> >     > > > How would you assess the podling's maturity?
> >     > > >
> >     > > > There are several deployments of SDAP actively being used and
> > interest
> >     > is
> >     > > > high. However, active participation from project members is
> low.
> > A push
> >     > > is
> >     > > > needed to cross the t's and dot the i's in regards to meeting
> the
> >     > > > requirements Apache has for releasing software so that we can
> > claim a
> >     > 1.0
> >     > > > version of SDAP.
> >     > > >
> >     > > > Please feel free to add your own commentary.
> >     > > >
> >     > > >   [X] Initial setup
> >     > > >   [X] Working towards first release
> >     > > >   [X] Community building
> >     > > >   [ ] Nearing graduation
> >     > > >
> >     > > > Date of last release:
> >     > > >
> >     > > >   XXXX-XX-XX
> >     > > >
> >     > > > When were the last committers or PPMC members elected?
> >     > > >
> >     > > > Maya Debellis was elected as a committer on 2019-02-08
> >     > > >
> >     > > > Have your mentors been helpful and responsive or are things
> > falling
> >     > > > through the cracks? In the latter case, please list any open
> > issues
> >     > > > that need to be addressed.
> >     > > >
> >     > > > Yes, mentors have been helpful and responsive.
> >     > > >
> >     > > > Signed-off-by:
> >     > > >
> >     > > >   [ ](sdap) Jörn Kottmann
> >     > > >      Comments:
> >     > > >   [ ](sdap) Trevor Grant
> >     > > >      Comments:
> >     > > >   [ ](sdap) Lewis John McGibbney
> >     > > >      Comments:
> >     > > >
> >     > >
> >     >
> >
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message