santuario-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Source download - duplicated files
Date Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:02:12 GMT
I don't really see how it's risky? They're just resources for running
tests/samples.

In any case, I've removed a whole load of the duplicates in the
samples directory, which are no longer used by the samples in 1.5.

Colm.

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com> wrote:
> Hi Colm,
>
> OK, but at least one large set (the one I pointed to) is just a straight
> duplicate. That seems risky.
>
> -Eric.
>
>
> On 2/13/12 4:34 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>>
>> In the 1.4.x series of releases, the "data" folder held both test and
>> sample resources. As part of 1.5, I refactored "data" into
>> "src/test/resources" for running tests, and put any resources used by
>> the samples into "samples". That way the samples and tests are
>> properly separated.
>>
>> Colm.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Sean Mullan<sean.mullan@oracle.com>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/13/2012 09:42 AM, Eric Johnson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> To whom it may concern,
>>>>
>>>> I just downloaded the source zip for the latest Java Santuario release
>>>> (1.5.0), and noticed duplicated files in the source zip release, as well
>>>> as in the Subversion tags for the project.
>>>>
>>>> Specifically:
>>>>
>>>> This download:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.apache.org/dist/santuario/java-library/1_5_0/xml-security-src-1_5_0.zip
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> contains duplicates on the paths samples/data/org/w3c/www and
>>>> src/test/resources/org/w3c/www.
>>>>
>>>> Looking via the web viewer of Subversion, I see similar duplication?
>>>>
>>>> [Apache-SVN]
>>>> /santuario/xml-security-java/tags/1.5.0/samples/data/org/w3c/www
>>>>
>>>> appears to be identical to:
>>>>
>>>> [Apache-SVN]
>>>> /santuario/xml-security-java/tags/1.5.0/src/test/resources/org/w3c/www
>>>>
>>>> Is this a mistake, or is this data intentionally duplicated?
>>>
>>>
>>> I think it was intentional (looks like it was done as part of
>>> Santuario-257), but should probably be fixed.
>>>
>>> Colm, any thoughts?
>>>
>>> --Sean
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
Colm O hEigeartaigh

Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com

Mime
View raw message