Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-santuario-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-santuario-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5706994AB for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49558 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2011 15:15:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-santuario-dev-archive@santuario.apache.org Received: (qmail 49533 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2011 15:15:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@santuario.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@santuario.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@santuario.apache.org Received: (qmail 49526 invoked by uid 99); 20 Dec 2011 15:15:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:15:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.182] (HELO mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com) (209.85.214.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:15:25 +0000 Received: by obbwd18 with SMTP id wd18so4554308obb.27 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 07:15:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.0.106 with SMTP id 10mr1983586obd.72.1324394104587; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 07:15:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.192.5 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 07:15:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:15:04 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: XML Security Java 1.5.0-RC1 available From: Chad La Joie To: dev@santuario.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Right, I am not at all trying to suggest it's a bug with this library. It most certainly is not. On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:12, Cantor, Scott wrote: > On 12/20/11 4:58 AM, "Colm O hEigeartaigh" wrote: >> >>It is up to the application calling the signature verification code to >>ensure that ID's are unique. > > This isn't Santuario's fault, but it's the parser's job if it supports > either schema validation OR DOM 3 (the latter being the problem). Not > enforcing uniqueness on setIdAttribute is either a bug or just blatantly > silly, depending on how strictly one wants to read the spec. > > -- Scott > -- Chad La Joie www.itumi.biz trusted identities, delivered