santuario-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sean Mullan <Sean.Mul...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Info required on SAX implementation of XML Dgital Signature verification
Date Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:38:01 GMT
It seems like the last time I worked on this, I didn't check in those 
new classes. Let me see if I can find an old workspace and I'll get back 
to you.

--Sean

Pankaj.Kharbe@cognizant.com wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> We are trying to use the SAX implementation of the XML Digital Signature 
> verification. The reason of choosing SAX over DOM is because we are 
> having huge files(10-30MB) whose signature needs to be created and 
> verified( Also it should be multithreaded). And in the DOM 
> implementation we are not able to meet NFRs in the processing time and 
> the Memory usage. Using the SAX implementation has reduced the 
> processing time and memory usage also but the difference is not huge. 
>  Has anyone got any different implementation or way of using the SAX 
> parser for the signature validation?
> 
>  
> 
> I was also looking at the STAX implementation code 
> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xml/security/branches/stax_jsr105/) 
> but I found that the branch code itself is incomplete. There are couple 
> of missing classes which have been used in it and its giving compilation 
> error.
> 
> Missing Classes name are –
> 
>>com.r_bg.stax.StaxStructure
> 
>>com.r_bg.stax.c14n.StaxCanonicalizationMethod
> 
>  
> 
> Can anyone point out where I can find these classes or how to implement 
> these classes?
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Pankaj Kharbe
> 
>  
> 
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of 
> the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged 
> information.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by 
> reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
> Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, 
> printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on 
> this e-mail is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful.
> 


Mime
View raw message