Mailing-List: contact security-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: security-dev@xml.apache.org
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: security-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44918] Allow to pass a custom config.xml resource
 path via Init.init() method
In-Reply-To: <bug-44918-6260@https.issues.apache.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-44918-6260@https.issues.apache.org/bugzilla/>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <20090623144852.D0FAF234C045@brutus.apache.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:48:52 -0700 (PDT)

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44918


--- Comment #7 from sean.mullan@sun.com  2009-06-23 07:48:52 PST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > (In reply to comment #4)
> > > Sean,
> > > 
> > > Yes, we always pass the custom config via
> > > org.apache.xml.security.resource.config
> > > property. The problem with this solution is the inability to specify different
> > > configs for e.g. different webservices in the same Container/VM.
> > 
> > Ok, but I believe that requires changes to support multiple configurations in
> > the same VM. Right now, there is only one configuration per VM.
> > So this patch doesn't solve that problem.
> 
> I think it does;-) but perhaps I didn't express myself correctly:
> What I meant is when I have multiple web-apps deployed (e.g webservices) and
> every deployment has it's own copy of xmlsec.jar then the
> org.apache.xml.security.Init class will be loaded multiple times, once per
> webapp beause of the class loader hirarchy. No?

Ok, I see now. Yes, I believe you're right. 

Let me think about this some more and get back to you.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.