Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-security-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 19920 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2006 14:37:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Nov 2006 14:37:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 79700 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2006 14:38:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xml-security-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 79543 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2006 14:38:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact security-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: Reply-To: security-dev@xml.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list security-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 79532 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2006 14:38:05 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 06:38:05 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 06:37:53 -0800 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 2AB4F7142FC; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 06:37:33 -0800 (PST) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: security-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40921] - XML contents modified and signature normallly validated. In-Reply-To: X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Message-Id: <20061108143733.2AB4F7142FC@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 06:37:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40921 ------- Additional Comments From sean.mullan@sun.com 2006-11-08 06:37 ------- I agree with Scott's reply. I haven't seen your code (can you post it?) but this is most likely not a bug. However, I am curious as to what key you are using to validate the signature. It seems you are using the correct key each time. If you validated with a key from this different X.509 certificate that you have inserted then it should not validate (if indeed it was a different public key). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.