santuario-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40880] - Ability to override DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance in XMLCipher
Date Sat, 04 Nov 2006 21:05:13 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40880>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40880





------- Additional Comments From cantor.2@osu.edu  2006-11-04 13:05 -------
I'm a little confused by what you're trying to fix, and I'm very concerned about
any non-JAXP technique that would be used override the DOM implementation. There
are lots of software packages out there, and people expect JAXP to be used as
Sun defines it to specify the DOM classes to use, or any other XML classes for
that matter.

As it is, we have to do ugly things with endorsement because of bugs in things
like Xerces when it comes to overriding functionality according to the JAXP
system properties. I wouldn't want xmlsec to invent its own parser override
mechanism.

If I'm misunderstanding the problem here, sorry for interjecting.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Mime
View raw message